From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hemant Agrawal Subject: Re: [PATCH] relicense various bits of the dpdk Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:14:27 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20171204155557.31915-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman , Return-path: Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.57]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815B51D8E for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:44:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171204155557.31915-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 12/4/2017 9:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > Received a note the other day from the Linux Foundation governance board > for DPDK indicating that several files I have copyright on need to be > relicensed to be compliant with the DPDK licensing guidelines. I have > some concerns with some parts of the request, but am not opposed to > other parts. So, for those pieces that we are in consensus on, I'm > proposing that we change their license from BSD 2 clause to 3 clause. > I'm also updating the files to use the SPDX licensing scheme > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > CC: Hemant Agrawal > CC: Thomas Monjalon > --- > devtools/validate-abi.sh | 32 ++++---------------------------- > lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h | 24 +----------------------- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal