From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Tf5E=FI=dpdk.org=dev-bounces@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D655C433FE
	for <dpdk-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 13:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950620702
	for <dpdk-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 13:07:09 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A950620702
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=affirmednetworks.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51316375B;
	Fri,  4 Dec 2020 14:07:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out.exch021.serverdata.net (out.exch021.serverdata.net
 [64.78.24.57]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8003256
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 14:07:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MBX021-E6-VA-1.exch021.domain.local (10.216.132.148) by
 MBX021-E6-VA-2.exch021.domain.local (10.216.132.150) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id
 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:07:02 -0500
Received: from MBX021-E6-VA-1.exch021.domain.local ([10.216.132.148]) by
 MBX021-E6-VA-1.exch021.domain.local ([10.216.132.148]) with mapi id
 15.01.2106.004; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:07:02 -0500
From: Pranab Das <pranab_das@affirmednetworks.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: DPDK secondary process access to  mbufs using
 rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf()
Thread-Index: AdbKPag1LpGOivEXTcy4dnN1C12Oeg==
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 13:07:01 +0000
Message-ID: <ff6cc212baf84ae58d71c25563fe69c5@affirmednetworks.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [96.252.12.239]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK secondary process access to mbufs using
 rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf()
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi

I am wondering if the secondary DPDK processes can access  the mbufs that a=
re attached using rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf().
The DPDK primary process allocates the buffer pool from the heap.  Is there=
 any example application that you can refer to ?

Thank you very much


  *   PKDas