From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from proxmox.maurer-it.com (proxmox.maurer-it.com [94.136.31.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id D8761100EBF0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:43:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Roland Kammerer , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Message-ID: <1348675331.157.1431333818922.JavaMail.open-xchange@ronja.mits.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150511074859.GU1968@rck.sh> References: <1676265523.49.1431326660324.JavaMail.open-xchange@ronja.mits.lan> <20150511074859.GU1968@rck.sh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] drbdmanage package name Reply-To: Dietmar Maurer List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Currently, it is a "frankenstein-package" anyways, because it contains > the server, the modules which could be used for example to write your > own client, and the client itself... > > I will keep it in mind and think about renaming/splitting. Yes, I guess you should split the package if it contains a library. But the package with the binary toolkit should be called 'drbdmanage', an sections should be 'admin' instead of 'python'. I also noticed that you do not apply the quilt patches, which is good because the included patches are out of date. I suggest to remove patch 0001-var-lib-drbdd.patch from debian/patches/series to avoid confusion.