From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from proxmox.maurer-it.com (proxmox.maurer-it.com [94.136.31.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 008D11028A59 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:54:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D8EEAD09E2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:44:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:44:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Dietmar Maurer To: drbd-dev Message-ID: <1676265523.49.1431326660324.JavaMail.open-xchange@ronja.mits.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Drbd-dev] drbdmanage package name Reply-To: Dietmar Maurer List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I just saw that you name the package 'python-drbdmanage'. > Package: python-drbdmanage Why don't you simply call it 'drbdmanage'? IMHO, adding 'python' would be OK for a python library, but not for a binary package?