From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [Drbd-dev] [patch] __bio_clone() behaviour
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:46:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050126164612.GH5511@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]
With the __bio_clone() bugfix by Jens Axboe (in the recent 2.6.10-ac
kernels or SLES9 SP1) which causes __bio_clone() to copy the bi_io_vec,
it would always try to copy the _maximum_ size, as defined by
bio_src->bi_max_vecs:
inline void __bio_clone(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_src)
{
request_queue_t *q = bdev_get_queue(bio_src->bi_bdev);
memcpy(bio->bi_io_vec, bio_src->bi_io_vec, bio_src->bi_max_vecs * sizeof(struct bio_vec));
...
drbd however only has space for a single iovec (because it's all
statically allocated right now), and so the memcpy would silently
overwrite memory.
The attached patch 'fixes' this up.
Note that it is a bit ugly but safe, as drbd already asserts that
bi_vcnt == 1 anyway.
FWIW, drbd seems to be the only user of __bio_clone() I could find,
there's no in-tree users, everything goes through bio_clone() otherwise,
which would have dynamically allocated the properly sized structures.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business
[-- Attachment #2: drbd-0.7.9-2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 741 bytes --]
Index: drbd_compat_wrappers.h
===================================================================
--- drbd_compat_wrappers.h (revision 1736)
+++ drbd_compat_wrappers.h (working copy)
@@ -538,7 +538,9 @@
bio_init(bio); // bio->bi_flags = 0;
bio->bi_io_vec = bvec;
bio->bi_max_vecs = 1;
-
+
+ /* FIXME: __bio_clone() workaround, fix me properly later! */
+ bio_src->bi_max_vecs = 1;
__bio_clone(bio,bio_src);
bio->bi_bdev = mdev->backing_bdev;
bio->bi_private = mdev;
@@ -559,6 +561,8 @@
bio->bi_io_vec = bvec;
bio->bi_max_vecs = 1;
+ /* FIXME: __bio_clone() workaround, fix me properly later! */
+ bio_src->bi_max_vecs = 1;
__bio_clone(bio,bio_src);
bio->bi_bdev = mdev->backing_bdev;
bio->bi_private = mdev;
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-26 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-26 16:46 Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2005-01-27 8:56 ` [Drbd-dev] [patch] __bio_clone() behaviour Philipp Reisner
2005-01-27 9:16 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050126164612.GH5511@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox