From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from shopwall.abacus.ch (shopwall.abacus.ch [193.246.120.14]) by mail.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 0B08525753 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postman.abacus.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F4712F891 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postman.abacus.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postman [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04210-02-81 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:57:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hug64.int.abacus.ch.int.abacus.ch (unknown [172.16.34.85]) by postman.abacus.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id E964512F6BE for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:57:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Philipp Hug To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] 0.7.11 soon Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:58:42 +0200 References: <200505091030.00455.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> In-Reply-To: <200505091030.00455.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505091058.42759.hug@abanet.ch> List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , philipp, if you release a new version it won't make it into sarge... 0.7.10 will be in sarge and has to be supported for about 2 years ;-) philipp On Monday 09 May 2005 10.30, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Hi, > > The last DRBD release happened on the 31st Jan of 2005, this > is more than 3 month by now. I guess we need to give our > users the feeling that DRBD is still alive :) > > 0.7.11 (api:77/proto:74) > ----- > * The upper limit of the runtime tuning parameter max_buffers > was ways too low for today's IBM storage controllers. > Was 32 - 10000 ; Now it is 32 - 131072 ( Now one could > allow DRBD to allocate up to half a gigabyte of memory as > receive buffers) > * A fix to the Makefiles to make building of RPMs work on RAHS4. > * A workaround to have DBRD running on PPC64 with Linux-2.4.x kernels, > on Linux-2.6.x everything was fine already. > * Removal of dead code (busy_blocks). > > I will tag, create the tar-ball and announce it on wednesday, > as long as nobody objects. > > -phil