From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] DRBD gets stuck in BrokenPipe state
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:46:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081222124606.GC7914@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494E8946.5020105@dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:21:58PM +0300, Yuri Frolov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm pretty new with DRBD, so forgive me, If I ask something simple or
> well-known.
> I've faced with the problem that drbd moves to "BrokenPipe" state and
> never gets out of it.
> I've searched the web and found out, that the problem looks to be known,
> but I haven't found a proper solution for 0.7.x series,
> have I been missing something, that really exists?
as recently also posted on drbd-user:
drbd 0.7 is seriously end-of-life.
we won't even bother to track down issues in the 0.7 code base.
unless you are a well paying existing customer ;)
and even then we'd persuade you to upgrade.
> The exact version of code is
>
> # cat /proc/drbd version: 0.7.21 (api:79/proto:74)
>
> Here the logs
>
> ncs_pseudo_drbd.out log:
> Tue Mar 18 16:47:03 UTC 2008 In script: get_cs r1 BrokenPipe
> Tue Mar 18 16:47:13 UTC 2008 In script: get_cs r1 BrokenPipe
> Tue Mar 18 16:47:13 UTC 2008 In script: get_cs Broken pipe after multiple retries
>
> syslog:
> Mar 18 16:31:06 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: Secondary/Secondary --> Primary/Secondary
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: meta connection shut down by peer.
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: sock was shut down by peer
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: sock_sendmsg returned -32
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: drbd1_asender [4902]: cstate Connected --> NetworkFailure
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: asender terminated
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: drbd1_receiver [4751]: cstate NetworkFailure --> BrokenPipe
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: short read expecting header on sock: r=0
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: drbd1_worker [4725]: cstate BrokenPipe --> BrokenPipe
> Mar 18 16:45:39 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: drbd1: short sent UnplugRemote size=8 sent=0
> Mar 18 16:45:40 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: TIPC: Lost link <1.1.239:bond0-1.1.31:bond0> on network plane A
> Mar 18 16:45:40 F101-SLOT-2 kernel: TIPC: Lost contact with <1.1.31>
> Mar 18 16:47:13 F101-SLOT-2 ncs_scap: NCS_AvSv: Card going for reboot -safComp=ScbRepl,safSu=WibbScb1_SU,safNode=SC_2_14 faulted due to 1 -rcvr=6
> --- Here pdrbd daemon reboot the system because drbd got stuck in BrokenPipe state (as shown in ncs_pseudo_drbd.out logs)
>
> So, is the problem known and the fix exists or it's something new? Could
> you suggest the best place to look at in the sources?
sorry, no. drbd 0.7 is dead.
you may try using the latest 0.7, but there are probably a number of
bugs and race conditions left in the 0.7 code base, that will become
more and more likely exposed on newer hardware.
--
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-22 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 18:21 [Drbd-dev] DRBD gets stuck in BrokenPipe state Yuri Frolov
2008-12-22 12:46 ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081222124606.GC7914@barkeeper1-xen.linbit \
--to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox