From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from soda.linbit (office.linbit [86.59.100.100]) by mail.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 604A92E03762 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:41:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:41:57 +0100 From: Lars Ellenberg To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] DRBD 8.x and linux-2.6.10 Message-ID: <20081222154157.GH7914@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> References: <494FAF17.9000306@dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <494FAF17.9000306@dev.rtsoft.ru> List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 06:15:35PM +0300, Yuri Frolov wrote: > Hello, note that you best subscribe and ask these questions on drbd-user. -dev is actually low traffic, and only used to coordinate development. > Does any branch of DRBD 8.x exist which supposed to work seamless enough > with linux of versions near 2.6.10 -- 2.6.12?.. why would you want to use a linux version from that range? yes. of course. both of them. ;) so, 8.0. (most recent release as of this writing: 8.0.14) as well as drbd 8.3 (which should have been named 8.2.8, but was re-named to 8.3.0 as it contains some features which formerly have only been available to paying customers) as for "work seamless enough"... what gives you the impression that it would not? (though, of course, the "enough" part is always completely depending on personal point of view) -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.