From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from soda.linbit (unknown [10.9.9.55]) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 565871012A98 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:19:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:19:34 +0200 From: Lars Ellenberg To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Message-ID: <20090904141934.GC8060@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> References: <20090904135205.GT12157@bla.fasel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090904135205.GT12157@bla.fasel.org> Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Public Bugzilla List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Wolfram Schlich wrote: > Dear Linbit folks, > > as you are nowadays referencing bug numbers inside the DRBD > changelogs, what about a publicly accessible Bugzilla? Maybe. Maybe not. ;) If you ask me, I'd rather have (supposed to be) bugs reported on the mailing list (drbd-user) or via the LINBIT support channels (Customers only, obviously), than have a public bugzilla. I fear that a public bugzilla would just depleat our limited time pool yet again, by endless reports of "does not feed my cat, either". > Is there any other incarnation of a publicly available list > of bugs and the corresponding descriptions? Nope. -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.