From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lists@wolfram.schlich.org>
Received: from mail.laber.fasel.org (mail.laber.fasel.org [212.7.178.68])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 73CA01012A98
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.laber.fasel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.laber.fasel.org (Postfix/wolfram.schlich.biz) with ESMTP id
	0D729629C54
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.laber.fasel.org (Postfix/wolfram.schlich.biz) with ESMTP id
	02D1062978F
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.laber.fasel.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.laber.fasel.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10026)
	with ESMTP id 1dRUhWZv2xbk for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>;
	Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.laber.fasel.org (Postfix/wolfram.schlich.biz) with SMTP id
	3D755629C54
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.laber.fasel.org (Postfix/wolfram.schlich.biz) with ESMTP id
	2FD6062978F
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.bla.fasel.org (mail.bla.fasel.org
	[IPv6:2001:4b88:1066:32::35])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mail.bla.fasel.org",
	Issuer "ca.bla.fasel.org" (verified OK))
	by mail.laber.fasel.org (Postfix/wolfram.schlich.biz) with ESMTPS id
	CB37C62978F
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.bla.fasel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE525405FDA
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.bla.fasel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.bla.fasel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2254940BDE6
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 16:25:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:25:03 +0200
From: Wolfram Schlich <lists@wolfram.schlich.org>
To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Message-ID: <20090904142503.GU12157@bla.fasel.org>
References: <20090904135205.GT12157@bla.fasel.org>
	<20090904141934.GC8060@barkeeper1-xen.linbit>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090904141934.GC8060@barkeeper1-xen.linbit>
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Public Bugzilla
List-Id: Coordination of development <drbd-dev.lists.linbit.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/options/drbd-dev>,
	<mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
List-Help: <mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-dev>,
	<mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=subscribe>

* Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> [2009-09-04 16:19]:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > Dear Linbit folks,
> > 
> > as you are nowadays referencing bug numbers inside the DRBD
> > changelogs, what about a publicly accessible Bugzilla?
> 
> Maybe.
> Maybe not.
> 
>  ;)
> 
> If you ask me, I'd rather have (supposed to be) bugs reported on the
> mailing list (drbd-user) or via the LINBIT support channels (Customers
> only, obviously), than have a public bugzilla.
> 
> I fear that a public bugzilla would just depleat our limited time pool
> yet again, by endless reports of "does not feed my cat, either".

Oh -- I did not want to report bugs via Bugzilla, I just would like
to be able to read about the bugs fixed that are mentioned in the
changelogs, so I could perhaps conclude whether those bugs would
affect my setup at all.

Thanks,
Wolfram