From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kernel.dk (0122700014.0.fullrate.dk [95.166.99.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 39B0910BB09E for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 15:05:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:05:46 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Philipp Reisner Message-ID: <20100518130545.GZ25951@kernel.dk> References: <20100518152031.9a244971.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <201005181345.22986.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005181345.22986.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with the block tree List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 18 2010, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > FYI: > I use > git://git.drbd.org/linux-2.6-drbd.git for-jens > as path of my patches to Jens. > > I switched that tree to Jens' > git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git for-2.6.35 > and provided the DRBD patches on top of that. > > Not that I am not willing to help, I have the feeling that this > merge conflict has nothing to do with DRBD. I suspect that the merge will go smoothly with the updated branches when Stephen runs his scripts tomorrow. -- Jens Axboe