From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra.linbit.com (zimbra.linbit.com [212.69.161.123]) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 5836A103B4CB for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:16:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:16:48 +0200 From: Lars Ellenberg To: Kent Overstreet Message-ID: <20120926151648.GB17722@soda.linbit> References: <1348526106-17074-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1348526106-17074-7-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20120925115452.GF8143@soda.linbit> <20120925220624.GC22647@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120925220624.GC22647@google.com> Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, Jiri Kosina , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, Martin Schwidefsky , Steven Whitehouse , Alasdair Kergon , Lars Ellenberg Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH v3 06/26] block: Add bio_end_sector() List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:06:24PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:54:52PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:46PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > Just a little convenience macro - main reason to add it now is preparing > > > for immutable bio vecs, it'll reduce the size of the patch that puts > > > bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx into a struct bvec_iter. > > > > > > For the DRBD part: > Version below look good? > > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > index 01b2ac6..47f55db 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ void drbd_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) > /* to make some things easier, force alignment of requests within the > * granularity of our hash tables */ > s_enr = bio->bi_sector >> HT_SHIFT; > - e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio->bi_sector+(bio->bi_size>>9)-1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; > + e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio_end_sector(bio) - 1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; > > if (likely(s_enr == e_enr)) { > do { Sure. Cheers, Lars