From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com (zimbra.linbit.com [212.69.161.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 418D4101E064 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3676A3C78A5 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra13.linbit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 2cf4NOk7zd0e for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC4F3C78AF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra13.linbit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id E-eFRmazsRVD for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (rck.rck.sh [78.142.181.126]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E71603C78A5 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:14:01 +0100 From: Roland Kammerer To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Message-ID: <20141117141401.GU2136@rck.sh> References: <20141116143543.GA26665@miriup.de> <20141117122836.GT2136@rck.sh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141117122836.GT2136@rck.sh> Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] Correctly skip interface indexes larger than 256 List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:28:36PM +0100, Roland Kammerer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:35:43PM +0400, Dirk Tilger wrote: > > - X32(08) X32(08) X32(08) X32(08) " %*02x %*02x %*02x %*02x %s", > > + X32(08) X32(08) X32(08) X32(08) " %*x %*x %*x %*x %s", > > Are numbers larger than 0xff even possible? > Yes, it is possible... Thank you Dirk for the hint and the patch. Applied to our internal repo. Regards, rck