From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:35:21 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kent Overstreet Message-ID: <20150808123521.GA8216@lst.de> References: <1438412290.26596.14.camel@hasee> <20150801163356.GA21478@redhat.com> <1438581502.26596.24.camel@hasee> <20150804113626.GA12682@lst.de> <1438754604.29731.31.camel@hasee> <20150807073001.GA17485@lst.de> <1438990806.24452.8.camel@ssi> <20150808003057.GA1811@kmo-pixel> <20150808052226.GA7050@kmo-pixel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150808052226.GA7050@kmo-pixel> Cc: Mike Snitzer , Neil Brown , Ming Lei , dm-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , Alasdair Kergon , Lars Ellenberg , Philip Kelleher , Christoph Hellwig , Nitin Gupta , Ming Lin , Oleg Drokin , Al Viro , Ming Lin , Jens Axboe , Andreas Dilger , Geoff Levand , Jiri Kosina , lkml , Jim Paris , Minchan Kim , Dongsu Park , drbd-user@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:22:26PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Is granularity required to be a power of two? One would hope, but looking at the > code that doesn't appear to be a requirement... ugh, that's terrible... If devices have an odd granularity we'll just have to split more than nessecary. Let's hope no major hardware does that.