From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 09F281056445 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:05:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:05:22 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Snitzer Message-ID: <20160601140522.GA16228@infradead.org> References: <1464615294-9946-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <20160531155348.GA24840@redhat.com> <20160601134427.GA15888@infradead.org> <20160601135150.GA30759@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160601135150.GA30759@redhat.com> Cc: Jens Axboe , Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , "Martin K. Petersen" , Steven Whitehouse , Ming Lei , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sagi Grimberg , NeilBrown , Christoph Hellwig , Joe Thornber , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Shaohua Li , Tejun Heo , Keith Busch , "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" , Kent Overstreet , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "open list:DRBD DRIVER" Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:51:51AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > So should I not push this type of fix to Linus now? I was going to send > the above commit and this one to him this week: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.7&id=57b3001b240629ecc5266d28c845e23ca5f11719 > > Instead, should bcache be made to not do what it is doing? I think that's much preferably. Otherwise we'll get a constant trickles of patches like that whenever someone tries bcache on top of another stacking driver.