From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com (zimbra.linbit.com [212.69.161.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 585D01056471 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:51:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:51:43 +0100 From: Lars Ellenberg To: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <20161109165143.GN1382@soda.linbit> References: <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1478601789-15060-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <497abc52-093f-17ea-5fb5-645030a23a01@nod.at> <20161108165204.GC2834@kernel.dk> <20161109153209.GK1382@soda.linbit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Jens Axboe , wolfgang.glas@iteg.at, christoph.lechleitner@iteg.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:47:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Should I sent two patches, one that applies to 4.5 and later, > > and one that applies to 2.6.33 ... 4.4, or are you or stable > > willing to resolve the trivial "missing comment block" conflict yourself? > > BTW: Why did you drop the "Fixes:" tag too? > By accident, probably. I'm ok with you guys just using the original, if you prefer, just let me know. It's the fix, that's important, not how much noise we can make about that oneliner. Lars