From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id B16F51056446 for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 10:52:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w64so105197257wma.0 for ; Tue, 02 May 2017 01:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:44:16 +0200 From: Roland Kammerer To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Message-ID: <20170502084415.GA19200@rck.sh> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] drbd: Use seq_putc() once more in drbd_syncer_progress() List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 08:18:20PM +0200, elfring@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > From: SF Markus Elfring > Subject: [PATCH] drbd: Use seq_putc() once more in drbd_syncer_progress() > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:12:58 +0200 > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderbird/52.0.1 > > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:05:08 +0200 > > A single dot should be put into a sequence. > Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc". > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > index 8378142f7a55..fc0f627567fd 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void drbd_syncer_progress(struct drbd_device *device, struct seq_file *se > seq_putc(seq, '='); > seq_putc(seq, '>'); > for (i = 0; i < y; i++) > - seq_printf(seq, "."); > + seq_putc(seq, '.'); > seq_puts(seq, "] "); > > if (state.conn == C_VERIFY_S || state.conn == C_VERIFY_T) Thanks, applied internally, will be upstream eventually. Regards, rck