From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 4711342010C for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:08:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:07:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <20200720120734.GA29061@lst.de> References: <20200720075148.172156-1-hch@lst.de> <20200720075148.172156-5-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Richard Weinberger , LKML , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , device-mapper development , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , cgroups mailinglist , Christoph Hellwig , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 04/14] bdi: initialize ->ra_pages in bdi_init List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:58:22PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Hello Chrstoph, > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Set up a readahead size by default. This changes behavior for mtd, > > ubifs, and vboxsf to actually enabled readahead, the lack of which > > very much looks like an oversight. > > UBIFS doesn't enable readahead on purpose, please see: > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_readahead What about jffs2 and blk2mtd raw block devices?