From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id C11A54201DC for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 08:26:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 08:26:20 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6hmwalder?= Message-ID: <20220410062620.GA16234@lst.de> References: <20220409045043.23593-1-hch@lst.de> <20220409045043.23593-25-hch@lst.de> <72e9bd34-3380-e305-65f0-a17306f5bd08@linbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <72e9bd34-3380-e305-65f0-a17306f5bd08@linbit.com> Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li , Jens Axboe , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 24/27] block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > On 09.04.22 06:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard >> support, similar to what is done for write zeroes. >> >> The only places where needs special attention is the RAID5 driver, >> which must clear discard support for security reasons by default, >> even if the default stacking rules would allow for it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig >> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen >> Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder [btrfs] > > I think you may have a typo there: my ACK was for drbd, not btrfs. Indeed, sorry.