From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=6An1=25=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org>
Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75])
	by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 5A56C4203BD
	for <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:31:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 06:24:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <20221028062414.7859f787@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <Y1uSG/7VXWLNlxlt@infradead.org>
References: <20221027150525.753064657@goodmis.org>
	<20221027150925.819019339@goodmis.org>
	<20221027111944.39b3a80c@gandalf.local.home>
	<Y1uSG/7VXWLNlxlt@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [RFC][PATCH v2 04/31] timers: block: Use
 del_timer_shutdown() before freeing timer
List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches,
	contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user,
	please." <drbd-dev.lists.linbit.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linbit.com/mailman/options/drbd-dev>,
	<mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
List-Help: <mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-dev>,
	<mailto:drbd-dev-request@lists.linbit.com?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:26:03 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> This is just a single patch out of apparently 31, which claims that
> something that doesn't even exist in mainline must be used without any
> explanation.  How do you expect anyone to be able to review it?

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221027150525.753064657@goodmis.org/

Only the first patch is relevant to you. I guess the Cc list would have
been too big to Cc everyone that was Cc'd in the series.

It not being in mainline is the reason I marked it RFC. As it's more of an
FYI than a pull it in request.

-- Steve