From: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
To: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: fix a null-pointer dereference when the request event in drbd_request_endio() is READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:53:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b87cbab-49e2-4290-8784-b771e90e016f@linbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260104165355.151864-1-islituo@gmail.com>
On 1/4/26 17:53, Tuo Li wrote:
> In drbd_request_endio(), the request event what can be set to
> READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR. In this case, __req_mod() is invoked with a NULL
> peer_device:
>
> __req_mod(req, what, NULL, &m);
>
> When handling READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR, __req_mod() unconditionally calls
> drbd_set_out_of_sync():
>
> case READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR:
> drbd_set_out_of_sync(peer_device, req->i.sector, req->i.size);
>
> The drbd_set_out_of_sync() macro expands to __drbd_change_sync():
>
> #define drbd_set_out_of_sync(peer_device, sector, size) \
> __drbd_change_sync(peer_device, sector, size, SET_OUT_OF_SYNC)
>
> However, __drbd_change_sync() assumes a valid peer_device and immediately
> dereferences it:
>
> struct drbd_device *device = peer_device->device;
>
> If peer_device is NULL, this results in a NULL-pointer dereference.
>
> Fix this by adding a NULL check in __req_mod() before calling
> drbd_set_out_of_sync().
Thank you for the report and patch.
The bug analysis is correct, but the fix is not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> index d15826f6ee81..aa3da2733f14 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
> @@ -621,7 +621,8 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,
> break;
>
> case READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR:
> - drbd_set_out_of_sync(peer_device, req->i.sector, req->i.size);
> + if (peer_device)
> + drbd_set_out_of_sync(peer_device, req->i.sector, req->i.size);
> drbd_report_io_error(device, req);
> __drbd_chk_io_error(device, DRBD_READ_ERROR);
> fallthrough;
In this code path, peer_device is *always* NULL -- the only caller that
sets READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR is drbd_request_endio(), which always
passes NULL for peer_device. So this NULL check effectively turns the
drbd_set_out_of_sync() call into dead code.
Silently skipping the call here means we lose out-of-sync tracking
for local read errors, which is a data consistency problem.
The proper fix is to obtain the peer_device via
first_peer_device(device), like in a similar path in drbd_req_destroy
(drbd_req.c:125).
case READ_COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR:
drbd_set_out_of_sync(first_peer_device(device),
req->i.sector, req->i.size);
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Böhmwalder
LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
DRBD HA — Disaster Recovery — Software defined Storage
parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20260104165355.151864-1-islituo@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b87cbab-49e2-4290-8784-b771e90e016f@linbit.com \
--to=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=islituo@gmail.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox