Distributed Replicated Block Device (DRBD) development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	"Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drbd: select CONFIG_NET_HANDSHAKE
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:20:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74946481-4eb7-4d8d-b10a-881ebd84ee33@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b696861-ac39-4a87-a2fa-ad47a75031c6@linbit.com>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026, at 22:16, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> Am 18.03.26 um 11:48 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:

>>  config NET_HANDSHAKE_KUNIT_TEST
>>  	tristate "KUnit tests for the handshake upcall mechanism" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>
> Thanks for the fix, I applied it to our drbd-next tree (which should end
> up in linux-next).
>
> I would prefer to squash these kinds of fixups to keep the history in
> our patch series clean.
> Arnd, does that work for you? How do you prefer we handle attribution?
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't really find a clear precedence pattern for
> this, how is this usually handled?

Whichever way works best for you. Some people care a lot about 
attribution for bugfixes, but I generally prefer a clean history
myself.

     Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 10:48 [PATCH 1/2] drbd: fix rdma dependency Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-18 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] drbd: select CONFIG_NET_HANDSHAKE Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-18 21:16   ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-18 21:20     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-03-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] drbd: fix rdma dependency Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-18 15:31   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-18 15:36     ` Christoph Böhmwalder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74946481-4eb7-4d8d-b10a-881ebd84ee33@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox