From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.lan.jexiste.org (lb1.jexiste.org [84.207.24.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id B834C2CF09FE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:59:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [82.206.237.115] (helo=wide.bouthors.org) by mail1.lan.jexiste.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1GFrOZ-0005T2-SH for drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:59:50 +0200 Received: from cyb by wide.bouthors.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GFrOV-0003jp-HU for drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:59:39 +0300 From: Cyril Bouthors To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Debian and DRBD cooperation References: <87sljrdwxg.fsf@wide.bouthors.org> <20060821103235.GD7214@soda.linbit> <877j12pe64.fsf@wide.bouthors.org> <20060821105426.GE7214@soda.linbit> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:59:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060821105426.GE7214@soda.linbit> (Lars Ellenberg's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:54:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87bqqbvf10.fsf@wide.bouthors.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21 Aug 2006, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=3Ddrbd0.7#_1_4_5 > > #308640: /sbin/drbdsetup: doesn't work with x86_64 kernel > fixed; was broken because of a minor glitch between versions. > we now have compile time asserts in place so this is > unlikely to ever happen again. > > #337210: drbd0.7-utils: man page of drbdsetup is wrong > fixed; > example section has been removed/replaced with a url pointer to > examples on the web -- which may or may not be correct ;) > > #337242: drbd0.7-utils: Wrong argument supplied to drbdsetup > bogus; the "you must not give an index with internal" is correct > for the drbd.conf syntax. because it _implies_ the -1 on the drbdsetup > commandline. whatever the problem of the reporter was, this is not it. > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=3Ddrbd0.7#_1_6_5 > > #357298: drbd: fix building for x86_64 on i386 > has to be fixed debian internally, I think, in case it still > applies. Thanks. I've processed all the bugs we got from Debian users. There's only one left and it's a Debian-internal stuff, we are working on it, should be fixed later this week. > all of these have been dealt with very quickly > on drbd-user when first reported there. Maybe I missed something but I got no answer to those bug reports : http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2005-December/004194.html http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2005-December/004193.html http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2006-April/004872.html http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2006-April/004871.html =2D-=20 Cyril Bouthors --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE7EMrZ1SJHeqsYt8RAjUJAJ4gYbJBbiqSteg3T7u1sZVMh/veQACfV0Rq X5JMGaK6sviFbPkJJNgqaZQ= =+G+g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--