From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id B65F742016C for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Oliver Sang Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement Message-ID: References: <202406250948.e0044f1d-oliver.sang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, Ulf Hansson , feng.tang@intel.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, lkp@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , ying.huang@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal , Hannes Reinecke , Jens Axboe , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, fengwei.yin@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance improvement > but a regression now. is this expected? Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data integrity. I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly expected.