From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id CA987160952 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:16:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 06:06:49 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: jinji zhong Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce per-cgroup compression priority Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, corbet@lwn.net, senozhatsky@chromium.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, terrelln@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, feng.han@honor.com, liulu.liu@honor.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, zhongjinji@honor.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 01:05:07AM +0000, jinji zhong wrote: > This patch introduces a per-cgroup compression priority mechanism, > where different compression priorities map to different algorithms. > This allows administrators to select appropriate compression > algorithms on a per-cgroup basis. I don't think it makes sense to tie this to cgroups. Is there something preventing this from following the process hierarchy? Thanks. -- tejun