From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 8B011160876 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 07:17:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:17:50 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework Message-ID: References: <20260327223820.2244227-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: Philipp Reisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 07:30:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/27/26 4:38 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > > As discussed (context: [0]), here is the first version of our DRBD 9 > > rework series, intended for for-next via for-7.1/drbd. > > Will you fixup the kerneldoc (nits) and the assigned-but-not-read > issues and send out a new version? Also looks this series doesn't > actually apply to for-7.1/block, patch 12 fails. Looks like all this went in without any review? Since when have we started these grand replacements anyway, as they are known to cause bugs and regressions?