From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 7CB96160849 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:59:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7dbf23885dfso1380143a34.3 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 06:58:58 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20260327223820.2244227-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Philipp Reisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 4/7/26 11:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 07:30:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/27/26 4:38 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: >>> As discussed (context: [0]), here is the first version of our DRBD 9 >>> rework series, intended for for-next via for-7.1/drbd. >> >> Will you fixup the kerneldoc (nits) and the assigned-but-not-read >> issues and send out a new version? Also looks this series doesn't >> actually apply to for-7.1/block, patch 12 fails. > > Looks like all this went in without any review? Since when have we > started these grand replacements anyway, as they are known to cause > bugs and regressions? See the previous discussion, the goal is to sync the two drbd code bases. It's followed the "usual" pattern of the in-kernel driver being neglected and development and users pushed to the out-of-tree one, which is highly annoying. As per the previous thread, the intent is not to push to to mainline right now, but rather give it -next exposure without running into conflicts between the trees. for-7.x/drbd will be rebased as needed, and it's only in for-next for the stated reason. -- Jens Axboe