From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa5.hgst.iphmx.com (esa5.hgst.iphmx.com [216.71.153.144]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 9B99B420634 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 07:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Kfkqt3RRBz1Rwrw for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3jbjI_oPeAXB for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:08:20 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe References: <20220415045258.199825-1-hch@lst.de> <20220415045258.199825-28-hch@lst.de> From: Damien Le Moal In-Reply-To: <20220415045258.199825-28-hch@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 27/27] direct-io: remove random prefetches List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 4/15/22 13:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Randomly poking into block device internals for manual prefetches isn't > exactly a very maintainable thing to do. And none of the performance > criticil direct I/O implementations still use this library function s/criticil/critical > anyway, so just drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research