Re: [Drbd-dev] Protocol C

[raulhp <raulhp@ugr.es>]

It´s correct, Thanks Lars,

Regards,
Ra

El 2014-05-30 15:17, Lars Ellenberg escribió:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:28:19PM +0200, raulhp wrote:
>> >>>Am I misunderstanding your question?
>> >>You understand my question :-) only y want to understand how to 
>> use
>> >>existing code of ACK for multicast
>> >
>> >I don't think it works that way.
>>
>> Now, What do you think?
>
> I think, amoung other things, we have some a nice language barrier 
> here.
>
> I think, as I tried to explain,
> that you need to distinguish between what happens
> on the DRBD protocol level, and what happens
> on the communication transport level.
> The latter is what you are working on.
> You can do almost whatever you want there.
>
> But it should be obvious that you cannot re-use the
> DRBD protocol level "my-disk-has-failed-I-am-so-sorry" message
> to mean, on the transport layer,
> "please-resend-all-requests-I-did-miss", just because both
> concepts use the term "nack" somewhere in the description.
>
> Different things.
> Both needed.
> Not directly related.