From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:20:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0042b6c3-137d-83cf-dd48-eeffff61046a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f03536a0-2ffe-ed40-041e-0f277960a60d@intel.com>
On 10/7/2021 12:50, John Harrison wrote:
> On 10/4/2021 15:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> Add multi-lrc context registration H2G. In addition a workqueue and
>> process descriptor are setup during multi-lrc context registration as
>> these data structures are needed for multi-lrc submission.
>>
>> v2:
>> (John Harrison)
>> - Move GuC specific fields into sub-struct
>> - Clean up WQ defines
>> - Add comment explaining math to derive WQ / PD address
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 12 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 5 +
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h | 2 -
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> index 76dfca57cb45..48decb5ee954 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> @@ -239,6 +239,18 @@ struct intel_context {
>> struct intel_context *parent;
>> /** @number_children: number of children if parent */
>> u8 number_children;
>> + /** @guc: GuC specific members for parallel submission */
>> + struct {
>> + /** @wqi_head: head pointer in work queue */
>> + u16 wqi_head;
>> + /** @wqi_tail: tail pointer in work queue */
>> + u16 wqi_tail;
PS: As per comments on previous rev, something somewhere needs to
explicitly state what WQI means. One suggestion was to do that here,
ideally with maybe a brief description of what the queue is, how it is
used, etc. Although probably it would be better kept in a GuC specific
file. E.g. added to guc_fwif.h in patch #12.
John.
>> + /**
>> + * @parent_page: page in context state (ce->state) used
>> + * by parent for work queue, process descriptor
>> + */
>> + u8 parent_page;
>> + } guc;
>> } parallel;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> index 3ef9eaf8c50e..57339d5c1fc8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> @@ -942,6 +942,11 @@ __lrc_alloc_state(struct intel_context *ce,
>> struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>> context_size += PAGE_SIZE;
>> }
>> + if (intel_context_is_parent(ce) &&
>> intel_engine_uses_guc(engine)) {
>> + ce->parallel.guc.parent_page = context_size / PAGE_SIZE;
>> + context_size += PAGE_SIZE;
>> + }
>> +
>> obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(engine->i915, context_size,
>> I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_VOLATILE);
>> if (IS_ERR(obj))
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>> index 8ff582222aff..ba10bd374cee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ enum intel_guc_action {
>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4505,
>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4506,
>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE = 0x4600,
>> + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC = 0x4601,
>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_RESET_CLIENT = 0x5507,
>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LIMIT
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> index fa4be13c8854..0eeb2a9feeed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> @@ -52,8 +52,6 @@
>> #define GUC_DOORBELL_INVALID 256
>> -#define GUC_WQ_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2)
>> -
>> /* Work queue item header definitions */
>> #define WQ_STATUS_ACTIVE 1
>> #define WQ_STATUS_SUSPENDED 2
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> index 451d9ae861a6..ab6d7fc1b0b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -344,6 +344,45 @@ static inline struct i915_priolist
>> *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
>> return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
>> }
>> +/*
>> + * When using multi-lrc submission an extra page in the context
>> state is
>> + * reserved for the process descriptor and work queue.
>> + *
>> + * The layout of this page is below:
>> + * 0 guc_process_desc
>> + * ... unused
>> + * PAGE_SIZE / 2 work queue start
>> + * ... work queue
>> + * PAGE_SIZE - 1 work queue end
>> + */
>> +#define WQ_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE / 2)
>> +#define WQ_OFFSET (PAGE_SIZE - WQ_SIZE)
> I thought you were going with '#define PARENT_SCRATCH SIZE PAGE_SIZE'
> and then using that everywhere else? Unless there is a fundamental
> reason why the above must be exactly a page in size then I think the
> size should be defined once and re-used rather than assumed in
> multiple places (including in the description comment).
>
>> +static u32 __get_process_desc_offset(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->parallel.guc.parent_page);
>> +
>> + return ce->parallel.guc.parent_page * PAGE_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 __get_wq_offset(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + return __get_process_desc_offset(ce) + WQ_OFFSET;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct guc_process_desc *
>> +__get_process_desc(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Need to subtract LRC_STATE_OFFSET here as the
>> + * parallel.guc.parent_page is the offset into ce->state while
>> + * ce->lrc_reg_reg is ce->state + LRC_STATE_OFFSET.
>> + */
>> + return (struct guc_process_desc *)
>> + (ce->lrc_reg_state +
>> + ((__get_process_desc_offset(ce) -
>> + LRC_STATE_OFFSET) / sizeof(u32)));
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct guc_lrc_desc *__get_lrc_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
>> u32 index)
>> {
>> struct guc_lrc_desc *base = guc->lrc_desc_pool_vaddr;
>> @@ -1365,6 +1404,30 @@ static void unpin_guc_id(struct intel_guc
>> *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>> }
>> +static int __guc_action_register_multi_lrc(struct intel_guc *guc,
>> + struct intel_context *ce,
>> + u32 guc_id,
>> + u32 offset,
>> + bool loop)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_context *child;
>> + u32 action[4 + MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE];
>> + int len = 0;
>> +
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->parallel.number_children > MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE);
>> +
>> + action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC;
>> + action[len++] = guc_id;
>> + action[len++] = ce->parallel.number_children + 1;
>> + action[len++] = offset;
>> + for_each_child(ce, child) {
>> + offset += sizeof(struct guc_lrc_desc);
>> + action[len++] = offset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return guc_submission_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, 0, loop);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
>> u32 guc_id,
>> u32 offset,
>> @@ -1387,9 +1450,15 @@ static int register_context(struct
>> intel_context *ce, bool loop)
>> ce->guc_id.id * sizeof(struct guc_lrc_desc);
>> int ret;
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
>> trace_intel_context_register(ce);
>> - ret = __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id,
>> offset, loop);
>> + if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
>> + ret = __guc_action_register_multi_lrc(guc, ce, ce->guc_id.id,
>> + offset, loop);
>> + else
>> + ret = __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id, offset,
>> + loop);
>> if (likely(!ret)) {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -1418,6 +1487,7 @@ static int deregister_context(struct
>> intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id)
>> {
>> struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
>> trace_intel_context_deregister(ce);
>> return __guc_action_deregister_context(guc, guc_id);
>> @@ -1445,6 +1515,7 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct
>> intel_context *ce, bool loop)
>> struct guc_lrc_desc *desc;
>> bool context_registered;
>> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>> + struct intel_context *child;
>> int ret = 0;
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
>> @@ -1470,6 +1541,41 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct
>> intel_context *ce, bool loop)
>> desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
>> guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
>> + /*
>> + * Context is a parent, we need to register a process descriptor
>> + * describing a work queue and register all child contexts.
>> + */
> This was now meant to say 'If the context is a parent...'?
>
> John.
>
>> + if (intel_context_is_parent(ce)) {
>> + struct guc_process_desc *pdesc;
>> +
>> + ce->parallel.guc.wqi_tail = 0;
>> + ce->parallel.guc.wqi_head = 0;
>> +
>> + desc->process_desc = i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) +
>> + __get_process_desc_offset(ce);
>> + desc->wq_addr = i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) +
>> + __get_wq_offset(ce);
>> + desc->wq_size = WQ_SIZE;
>> +
>> + pdesc = __get_process_desc(ce);
>> + memset(pdesc, 0, sizeof(*(pdesc)));
>> + pdesc->stage_id = ce->guc_id.id;
>> + pdesc->wq_base_addr = desc->wq_addr;
>> + pdesc->wq_size_bytes = desc->wq_size;
>> + pdesc->wq_status = WQ_STATUS_ACTIVE;
>> +
>> + for_each_child(ce, child) {
>> + desc = __get_lrc_desc(guc, child->guc_id.id);
>> +
>> + desc->engine_class =
>> + engine_class_to_guc_class(engine->class);
>> + desc->hw_context_desc = child->lrc.lrca;
>> + desc->priority = ce->guc_state.prio;
>> + desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
>> + guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * The context_lookup xarray is used to determine if the hardware
>> * context is currently registered. There are two cases in
>> which it
>> @@ -2804,6 +2910,12 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32
>> desc_idx)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> + if (unlikely(intel_context_is_child(ce))) {
>> + drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
>> + "Context is child, desc_idx %u", desc_idx);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> return ce;
>> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-04 22:06 [PATCH 00/26] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 01/26] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 3:06 ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:13 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 3:37 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 1:28 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 18:23 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 03/26] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 3:45 ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:19 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:15 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 1:23 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 04/26] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 3:49 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 05/26] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:03 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 06/26] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 07/26] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:35 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 18:33 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:50 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 1:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:20 ` John Harrison [this message]
2021-10-08 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 09/26] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 20:23 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 10/26] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 22:03 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 1:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 16:40 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:03 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:11 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 11/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 12/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-05 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-10-05 10:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-08 17:20 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:24 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 13/26] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:39 ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 17:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 15/26] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:46 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 16/26] drm/i915: Fix bug in user proto-context creation that leaked contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:49 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 17/26] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:09 ` John Harrison
2021-10-11 22:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 18/26] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 19/26] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 20/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 23:32 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 1:52 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 21/26] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-05 8:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-10-05 17:02 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-06 20:46 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:22 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 0:37 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:56 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 0:18 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 23/26] drm/i915: Make request conflict tracking understand parallel submits Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 22:08 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 0:32 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:35 ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 17:51 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:25 ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 24/26] drm/i915: Update I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL to understand composite fences Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:15 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-10-12 7:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-12 18:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 25/26] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 26/26] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 18:11 ` [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0042b6c3-137d-83cf-dd48-eeffff61046a@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox