From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
To: "'Jindal, Sonika'" <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/exynos: Renaming DP training vswing pre emph defines
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:06:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00e301cfc286$36417760$a2c46620$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FEB0F3.8040404@intel.com>
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:33 PM, Sonika Sonika wrote:
> On 8/28/2014 6:25 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Friday, August 08, 2014 7:54 PM, Sonika Jindal wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Rename the defines to have levels instead of values for vswing and
> >> pre-emph levels as the values may differ in other scenarios like low vswing of
> >> eDP1.4 where the values are different.
> >>
> >> Done using following cocci patch for each define:
> >> @@
> >> @@
> >>
> >> # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400 (0 << 0)
> >> + # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0 (0 << 0)
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> index 4f3c7eb..02602a8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >> @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ static int exynos_dp_link_start(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> >> return retval;
> >>
> >> for (lane = 0; lane < lane_count; lane++)
> >> - buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_0 |
> >> - DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400;
> >> + buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0 |
> >> + DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0;
> >
> > NAK!
> >
> > It makes build error. Please build your patch, before sending the patch.
> > It is a rule when submitting patches.
> >
> > Please, fix it as follows.
> >
> > + buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_LEVEL_0|
> > + DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0;
> >
> I think the first patch which you have taken (which adds new defines) is
> the one from the previous series for the same change. In the second
> version, I have named them as DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_* which was done
> using cocci. Following is from that patch:
Oh, I see. Sorry for annoying you.
However, how about tagging V2, V3.. into patches? For instance,
'[PATCH V2 3/7] drm/exynos: Renaming DP training vswing pre emph defines'
It will be helpful, in order to prevent the same mistakes happening again.
Also, the patch looks good.
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_0 (0 << 3)
> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0 (0 << 3)
> # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_3_5 (1 << 3)
> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1 (1 << 3)
> # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_6 (2 << 3)
> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2 (2 << 3)
> # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_9_5 (3 << 3)
> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3 (3 << 3)
> > Best regards,
> > Jingoo Han
> >
> >>
> >> retval = exynos_dp_write_bytes_to_dpcd(dp, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
> >> lane_count, buf);
> >> --
> >> 1.7.10.4
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 10:53 [PATCH v2 0/7] Rename DP training vswing/pre-emph defines sonika.jindal
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm: Renaming DP training vswing pre emph defines sonika.jindal
2014-08-11 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Damien Lespiau
2014-08-26 11:28 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-27 4:31 ` Jindal, Sonika
2014-08-28 0:34 ` Jingoo Han
2014-08-27 7:47 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-27 7:51 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-27 13:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-27 13:11 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-28 7:01 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: " sonika.jindal
2014-08-11 17:04 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/exynos: " sonika.jindal
2014-08-28 0:55 ` Jingoo Han
2014-08-28 4:32 ` Jindal, Sonika
2014-08-28 6:06 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2014-08-28 6:11 ` Jindal, Sonika
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/gma500: " sonika.jindal
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/radeon: " sonika.jindal
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/tegra: " sonika.jindal
2014-08-08 10:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm: Remove old defines for vswing and pre-emph values sonika.jindal
2014-08-19 8:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Rename DP training vswing/pre-emph defines Jindal, Sonika
2014-08-25 12:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-27 6:08 ` Jindal, Sonika
2014-08-27 13:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Deucher, Alexander
2014-09-02 20:46 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00e301cfc286$36417760$a2c46620$%han@samsung.com' \
--to=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sonika.jindal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox