dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops
@ 2025-06-05 17:15 Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into separate functions Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Aradhya Bhatia @ 2025-06-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Aradhya Bhatia, Alexander Sverdlin

Hello all,

This series re-orders the sequences in which the drm CRTC and the drm
Bridge get enabled and disabled with respect to each other.

The bridge pre_enable calls have been shifted before the crtc_enable and
the bridge post_disable calls have been shifted after the crtc_disable.

This has been done as per the definition of bridge pre_enable.
"The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge will
not yet be running when this callback is called".

Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled.

The original sequence. for display pipe enable looks like:

      crtc_enable

      bridge[n]_pre_enable
      ...
      bridge[1]_pre_enable

      encoder_enable

      bridge[1]_enable
      ...
      bridge[n]_enable

The sequence of enable after this patch-set will look like:

      bridge[n]_pre_enable
      ...
      bridge[1]_pre_enable

      crtc_enable
      encoder_enable

      bridge[1]_enable
      ...
      bridge[n]_enable


For the disable sequence, this is what the original looks like:

      bridge[n]_disable
      ...
      bridge[1]_disable

      encoder_disable

      bridge[1]_post_disable
      ...
      bridge[n]_post_disable

      crtc_disable
	        
This is what the disable sequence will be, after this series of patches:

      bridge[n]_disable
      ...
      bridge[1]_disable

      encoder_disable
      crtc_disable

      bridge[1]_post_disable
      ...
      bridge[n]_post_disable

This series further updates the bridge API definitions to accurately
reflect the updated scenario.

This series is a subset of its v11[0] which had 14 patches in the revision.
9 of those 14 patches (which were specific to the cdns-dsi bridge driver)
were merged[1].

Regards
Aradhya

---

References:
[0]: Revision v11 of this series.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250329113925.68204-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/

[1]: Patches 1 through 9 getting merged.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/174335361171.2556605.12634785416741695829.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com/


---
Change Log:

  - Changes in v13:
    - Style  changes in patch 2/4. (Thomas)
    - Squash patch v12:4/5 into v12:3/5, which is now v13:3/4. (Thomas)
    - Add R-b tags from Thomas Zimmermann in patches 1-3.
    - Rebase onto latest drm-misc-next.

  - Changes in v12:
    - Drop patches 1 through 9 since they have been merged.
    - Rebase onto newer drm-misc-next.
    - Re-word the patch 3/4, ("drm/bridge: Update the bridge enable/disable doc")
      to make it more readable.

  - Changes in v11:
    - Add patch v11:13/14 ("drm/bridge: Update the bridge enable/disable doc"),
      that updates the documentation about the order of the various bridge
      enable/disable hooks being called wrt the CRTC and encoder hooks.
    - Rebase on drm-misc-next instead of linux-next.
      As part of rebase, accommodate the following change:
      - Change patch v10:08/13 ("drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Support atomic bridge
        APIs") to v11:08/13 ("drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Add input format
        negotiation"), since Maxime has already updated the bridge hooks to
        their atomic versions in commit 68c98e227a96 ("drm/bridge: cdns-csi:
        Switch to atomic helpers").
        My new patch now only adds the format negotiation hook for the cdns-dsi.
        (Note: Since the new patch is now only a subset of the old one, without
        any change in logic, I decided to carry forward the R-b and T-b tags.)
    - Add Alexander Sverdlin's T-b in patches 10, 11, 12.

  - Changes in v10:
    - Rebase on latest linux-next (next-20250226).
    - As part of rebase, update the patches to accommodate a couple of
      widespread changes in DRM Framework -
        - All the ("drm/atomic-helper: Change parameter name of ***") commits.
        - All the ("drm/bridge: Pass full state to ***") commits.
      (These updates are only trivial substitutions.)
    - Add Tomi Valkeinen's T-b tags in all the patches.

  - Changes in v9:
    - Fix the oops in 11/13 - where the encoder_bridge_enable _was_ pre_enabling
      the bridges instead of enabling.
    - Add the following tags:
      - Dmitry Baryshkov's R-b in patches 2, 10, 11, and A-b in patch 12.
      - Jayesh Choudhary's R-b in patch 12.
      - Tomi Valkeinen's R-b in patches 2, 10, 11, 12.

  - Changes in v8:
    - Move the phy de-initialization to bridge post_disable() instead of bridge
      disable() in patch-3.
    - Copy the private bridge state (dsi_cfg), in addition to the bridge_state,
      in patch-9.
    - Split patch v7:11/12 into three patches, v8:{10,11,12}/13, to separate out
      different refactorings into different patches, and improve bisectability.
    - Move patch v7:02/12 down to v8:06/12, to keep the initial patches for
      fixes only.
    - Drop patch v7:04/12 as it doesn't become relevant until patch v7:12/12.
    - Add R-b tags of Dmitry Baryshkov in patch-9 and patch-3, and of
      Tomi Valkeinen in patch-9.
   
  - Changes in v7:
    - phy_init()/exit() were called from the PM path in v6. Change it back to
      the bridge enable/disable path in patch-3, so that the phy_init() can go
      back to being called after D-Phy reset assert.
    - Reword commit text in patch-5 to explain the need of the fix.
    - Drop the stray code in patch-10.
    - Add R-b tag of Dmitry Baryshkov in patch-6.

  - Changes in v6:
    - Reword patch 3 to better explain the fixes around phy de-init.
    - Fix the Lane ready timeout condition in patch 7.
    - Fix the dsi _bridge_atomic_check() implementation by adding a new
      bridge state structure in patch 10.
    - Rework and combine patches v5:11/13 and v5:12/13 to v6:11/12.
    - Generate the patches of these series using the "patience" algorithm.
      Note: All patches, except v6:11/12, *do not* differ from their default
      (greedy) algorithm variants.
      For patch 11, the patience algorithm significantly improves the readability.
    - Rename and move the Bridge enable/disable enums from public to private
      in patch 11.
    - Add R-b tags of Tomi Valkeinen in patch 6, and Dmitry Baryshkov in patch 2.

  - Changes in v5:
    - Fix subject and description in patch 1/13.
    - Add patch to check the return value of
      phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config() (patch: 6/13).
    - Change the Clk and Data Lane ready timeout from forever to 5s.
    - Print an error instead of calling WARN_ON_ONCE in patch 7/13.
    - Drop patch v4-07/11: "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Reset the DCS write FIFO".
      There has been some inconsistencies found with this patch upon further
      testing. This patch was being used to enable a DSI panel based on ILITEK
      ILI9881C bridge. This will be debugged separately.
    - Add patch to move the DSI mode check from _atomic_enable() to
      _atomic_check() (patch: 10/13).
    - Split patch v4-10/11 into 2 patches - 11/13 and 12/13.
      Patch 11/13 separates out the Encoder-Bridge operations into a helper
      function *without* changing the logic. Patch 12/13 then changes the order
      of the encoder-bridge operations as was intended in the original patch.
    - Add detailed comment for patch 13/13.
    - Add Tomi Valkeinen's R-b in patches 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13.

  - Changes in v4:
    - Add new patch, "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Move to devm_drm_of_get_bridge()",
      to update to an auto-managed way of finding next bridge in the chain.
    - Drop patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix the phy_initialized variable" and
      add "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix Phy _init() and _exit()" that properly
      de-initializes the Phy and maintains the initialization state.
    - Reword patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Reset the DCS write FIFO" to explain
      the HW concerns better.
    - Add R-b tag from Dmitry Baryshkov for patches 1/11 and 8/11.

  - Changes in v3:
    - Reword the commit message for patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix OF node
      pointer".
    - Add a new helper API to figure out DSI host input pixel format
      in patch "drm/mipi-dsi: Add helper to find input format".
    - Use a common function for bridge pre-enable and enable, and bridge disable
      and post-disable, to avoid code duplication.
    - Add T-b tag from Dominik Haller in patch 5/10. (Missed to add it in v2).
    - Add R-b tag from Dmitry Baryshkov for patch 8/10.

  - Changes in v2:
    - Drop patch "drm/tidss: Add CRTC mode_fixup"
    - Split patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix minor bugs" into 4 separate ones
    - Drop support for early_enable/late_disable APIs and instead re-order the
      pre_enable / post_disable APIs to be called before / after crtc_enable /
      crtc_disable.
    - Drop support for early_enable/late_disable in cdns-dsi and use
      pre_enable/post_disable APIs instead to do bridge enable/disable.


Previous versions:

v1:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240511153051.1355825-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
v2:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530093621.1925863-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
v3:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617105311.1587489-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
v4:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240622110929.3115714-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
v5:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241019195411.266860-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v6:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250111192738.308889-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v7:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250114055626.18816-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v8:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250126191551.741957-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v9:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250209121032.32655-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226155228.564289-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v11: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250329113925.68204-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
v12: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250406131642.171240-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/

---

Aradhya Bhatia (4):
  drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into
    separate functions
  drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from
    enable/disable
  drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable

 .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c    |  64 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c           | 160 +++++++++--
 include/drm/drm_bridge.h                      | 249 +++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)


base-commit: 0b3d99425891e3c4a87259afb88fbd1168dc7707
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v13 1/4] drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into separate functions
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
@ 2025-06-05 17:15 ` Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Aradhya Bhatia @ 2025-06-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Aradhya Bhatia, Alexander Sverdlin

From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>

The way any singular display pipeline, in need of a modeset, gets
enabled is as follows -

	crtc enable
	(all) bridge pre-enable
	encoder enable
	(all) bridge enable

- and the disable sequence is exactly the reverse of this.

The crtc operations occur by looping over the old and new crtc states,
while the encoder and bridge operations occur together, by looping over
the connector states of the display pipelines.

Refactor these operations - crtc enable/disable, and encoder & bridge
(pre/post) enable/disable - into separate functions each, to make way
for the re-ordering of the enable/disable sequences.

This patch doesn't alter the sequence of crtc/encoder/bridge operations
in any way, but helps to cleanly pave the way for the next two patches,
by maintaining logical bisectability.

Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
index ee64ca1b1bec..d185486071c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
@@ -1160,11 +1160,10 @@ crtc_needs_disable(struct drm_crtc_state *old_state,
 }
 
 static void
-disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+encoder_bridge_disable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
 	struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state, *new_conn_state;
-	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
 	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, *new_crtc_state;
 	int i;
 
@@ -1227,6 +1226,14 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 
 		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge, state);
 	}
+}
+
+static void
+crtc_disable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, *new_crtc_state;
+	int i;
 
 	for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i) {
 		const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *funcs;
@@ -1274,6 +1281,14 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	encoder_bridge_disable(dev, state);
+
+	crtc_disable(dev, state);
+}
+
 /**
  * drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state - update legacy modeset state
  * @dev: DRM device
@@ -1483,28 +1498,12 @@ static void drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(struct drm_device *dev,
 	}
 }
 
-/**
- * drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables - modeset commit to enable outputs
- * @dev: DRM device
- * @state: atomic state object being committed
- *
- * This function enables all the outputs with the new configuration which had to
- * be turned off for the update.
- *
- * For compatibility with legacy CRTC helpers this should be called after
- * drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes(), which is what the default commit function
- * does. But drivers with different needs can group the modeset commits together
- * and do the plane commits at the end. This is useful for drivers doing runtime
- * PM since planes updates then only happen when the CRTC is actually enabled.
- */
-void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
-					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+static void
+crtc_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
 	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
 	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
-	struct drm_connector *connector;
-	struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
 	int i;
 
 	for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i) {
@@ -1528,6 +1527,14 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
 				funcs->commit(crtc);
 		}
 	}
+}
+
+static void
+encoder_bridge_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
+	struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
+	int i;
 
 	for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, new_conn_state, i) {
 		const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs *funcs;
@@ -1565,6 +1572,28 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_enable(bridge, state);
 	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables - modeset commit to enable outputs
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @state: atomic state object being committed
+ *
+ * This function enables all the outputs with the new configuration which had to
+ * be turned off for the update.
+ *
+ * For compatibility with legacy CRTC helpers this should be called after
+ * drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes(), which is what the default commit function
+ * does. But drivers with different needs can group the modeset commits together
+ * and do the plane commits at the end. This is useful for drivers doing runtime
+ * PM since planes updates then only happen when the CRTC is actually enabled.
+ */
+void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
+					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	crtc_enable(dev, state);
+
+	encoder_bridge_enable(dev, state);
 
 	drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(dev, state);
 }
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v13 2/4] drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from enable/disable
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into separate functions Aradhya Bhatia
@ 2025-06-05 17:15 ` Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Aradhya Bhatia @ 2025-06-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Aradhya Bhatia, Alexander Sverdlin

The encoder-bridge ops occur by looping over the new connector states of
the display pipelines. The enable sequence runs as follows -

	- pre_enable(bridge),
	- enable(encoder),
	- enable(bridge),

while the disable sequnce runs as follows -

	- disable(bridge),
	- disable(encoder),
	- post_disable(bridge).

Separate out the pre_enable(bridge), and the post_disable(bridge)
operations into separate functions each.

This patch keeps the sequence same for any singular disaplay pipe, but
changes the sequence across multiple display pipelines.

This patch is meant to be an interim patch, to cleanly pave the way for
the sequence re-ordering patch, and maintain bisectability in the
process.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
index d185486071c5..539b7f072c72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
@@ -1223,8 +1223,6 @@ encoder_bridge_disable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 			else if (funcs->dpms)
 				funcs->dpms(encoder, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
 		}
-
-		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge, state);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1281,11 +1279,65 @@ crtc_disable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+encoder_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
+	struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state, *new_conn_state;
+	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, *new_crtc_state;
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_oldnew_connector_in_state(state, connector, old_conn_state, new_conn_state, i) {
+		struct drm_encoder *encoder;
+		struct drm_bridge *bridge;
+
+		/*
+		 * Shut down everything that's in the changeset and currently
+		 * still on. So need to check the old, saved state.
+		 */
+		if (!old_conn_state->crtc)
+			continue;
+
+		old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, old_conn_state->crtc);
+
+		if (new_conn_state->crtc)
+			new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
+								       new_conn_state->crtc);
+		else
+			new_crtc_state = NULL;
+
+		if (!crtc_needs_disable(old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state) ||
+		    !drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(old_conn_state->crtc->state))
+			continue;
+
+		encoder = old_conn_state->best_encoder;
+
+		/*
+		 * We shouldn't get this far if we didn't previously have
+		 * an encoder.. but WARN_ON() rather than explode.
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON(!encoder))
+			continue;
+
+		drm_dbg_atomic(dev, "post-disabling bridges [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n",
+			       encoder->base.id, encoder->name);
+
+		/*
+		 * Each encoder has at most one connector (since we always steal
+		 * it away), so we won't call disable hooks twice.
+		 */
+		bridge = drm_bridge_chain_get_first_bridge(encoder);
+		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge, state);
+	}
+}
+
 static void
 disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	encoder_bridge_disable(dev, state);
 
+	encoder_bridge_post_disable(dev, state);
+
 	crtc_disable(dev, state);
 }
 
@@ -1498,6 +1550,38 @@ static void drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(struct drm_device *dev,
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+encoder_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
+	struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, new_conn_state, i) {
+		struct drm_encoder *encoder;
+		struct drm_bridge *bridge;
+
+		if (!new_conn_state->best_encoder)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!new_conn_state->crtc->state->active ||
+		    !drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(new_conn_state->crtc->state))
+			continue;
+
+		encoder = new_conn_state->best_encoder;
+
+		drm_dbg_atomic(dev, "pre-enabling bridges [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n",
+			       encoder->base.id, encoder->name);
+
+		/*
+		 * Each encoder has at most one connector (since we always steal
+		 * it away), so we won't call enable hooks twice.
+		 */
+		bridge = drm_bridge_chain_get_first_bridge(encoder);
+		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge, state);
+	}
+}
+
 static void
 crtc_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
@@ -1559,7 +1643,6 @@ encoder_bridge_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 		 * it away), so we won't call enable hooks twice.
 		 */
 		bridge = drm_bridge_chain_get_first_bridge(encoder);
-		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge, state);
 
 		if (funcs) {
 			if (funcs->atomic_enable)
@@ -1593,6 +1676,8 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
 {
 	crtc_enable(dev, state);
 
+	encoder_bridge_pre_enable(dev, state);
+
 	encoder_bridge_enable(dev, state);
 
 	drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(dev, state);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into separate functions Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
@ 2025-06-05 17:15 ` Aradhya Bhatia
       [not found]   ` <CGME20250611104512eucas1p22450fccf3bb7521760bd2d9a2a56ba19@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Aradhya Bhatia @ 2025-06-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Aradhya Bhatia, Alexander Sverdlin

From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>

Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
post_disable call after the crtc disable.

The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:

	bridge[n]_pre_enable
	...
	bridge[1]_pre_enable

	crtc_enable
	encoder_enable

	bridge[1]_enable
	...
	bridge[n]_enable

And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:

	bridge[n]_disable
	...
	bridge[1]_disable

	encoder_disable
	crtc_disable

	bridge[1]_post_disable
	...
	bridge[n]_post_disable

The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
"The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
will not yet be running when this callback is called".

Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.

While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.

Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c |   8 +-
 include/drm/drm_bridge.h            | 249 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
index 539b7f072c72..2fe6c91910a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
@@ -1336,9 +1336,9 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	encoder_bridge_disable(dev, state);
 
-	encoder_bridge_post_disable(dev, state);
-
 	crtc_disable(dev, state);
+
+	encoder_bridge_post_disable(dev, state);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1674,10 +1674,10 @@ encoder_bridge_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
 					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
-	crtc_enable(dev, state);
-
 	encoder_bridge_pre_enable(dev, state);
 
+	crtc_enable(dev, state);
+
 	encoder_bridge_enable(dev, state);
 
 	drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(dev, state);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
index 0af5db244db8..ecdeb90e5586 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
@@ -165,17 +165,33 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @disable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right before
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
-	 * bridge's @disable vfunc. If the preceding element is a &drm_encoder
-	 * it's called right before the &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable,
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare or &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
-	 * hook.
+	 * The @disable callback should disable the bridge.
 	 *
 	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
 	 * signals) feeding it is still running when this callback is called.
 	 *
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
+	 * that bridge is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called before the encoder is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
+	 *
+	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms.
+	 *
 	 * The @disable callback is optional.
 	 *
 	 * NOTE:
@@ -188,17 +204,34 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @post_disable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right after the
-	 * preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the preceding
-	 * element is a bridge this means it's called after that bridge's
-	 * @post_disable function. If the preceding element is a &drm_encoder
-	 * it's called right after the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
-	 * or &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
-	 *
 	 * The bridge must assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
-	 * signals) feeding it is no longer running when this callback is
-	 * called.
+	 * signals) feeding this bridge is no longer running when the
+	 * @post_disable is called.
+	 *
+	 * This callback should perform all the actions required by the hardware
+	 * after it has stopped receiving signals from the preceding element.
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
+	 * that bridge is post-disabled (unless marked otherwise by the
+	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.post_disable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_post_disable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called after the encoder is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
+	 *
+	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms
 	 *
 	 * The @post_disable callback is optional.
 	 *
@@ -241,18 +274,30 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @pre_enable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right before
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
-	 * bridge's @pre_enable function. If the preceding element is a
-	 * &drm_encoder it's called right before the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit or
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
-	 *
 	 * The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
-	 * will not yet be running when this callback is called. The bridge must
-	 * not enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the chain (if
-	 * there is one) when this callback is called.
+	 * will not yet be running when the @pre_enable is called.
+	 *
+	 * This callback should perform all the necessary actions to prepare the
+	 * bridge to accept signals from the preceding element.
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
+	 * that bridge is pre-enabled (unless marked otherwise by
+	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.pre_enable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_pre_enable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called before the CRTC is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
+	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
 	 *
 	 * The @pre_enable callback is optional.
 	 *
@@ -266,19 +311,31 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @enable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right after
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called after that
-	 * bridge's @enable function. If the preceding element is a
-	 * &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit or
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
+	 * The @enable callback should enable the bridge.
 	 *
 	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
 	 * signals) feeding it is running when this callback is called. This
 	 * callback must enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the
 	 * chain if there is one.
 	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
+	 * that bridge is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.enable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called after the CRTC is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
+	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
+	 * - drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
 	 * The @enable callback is optional.
 	 *
 	 * NOTE:
@@ -291,17 +348,30 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @atomic_pre_enable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right before
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
-	 * bridge's @atomic_pre_enable or @pre_enable function. If the preceding
-	 * element is a &drm_encoder it's called right before the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable hook.
-	 *
 	 * The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
-	 * will not yet be running when this callback is called. The bridge must
-	 * not enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the chain (if
-	 * there is one) when this callback is called.
+	 * will not yet be running when the @atomic_pre_enable is called.
+	 *
+	 * This callback should perform all the necessary actions to prepare the
+	 * bridge to accept signals from the preceding element.
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
+	 * that bridge is pre-enabled (unless marked otherwise by
+	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.pre_enable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_pre_enable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called before the CRTC is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
+	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
 	 *
 	 * The @atomic_pre_enable callback is optional.
 	 */
@@ -311,18 +381,31 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @atomic_enable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right after
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called after that
-	 * bridge's @atomic_enable or @enable function. If the preceding element
-	 * is a &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable hook.
+	 * The @atomic_enable callback should enable the bridge.
 	 *
 	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
 	 * signals) feeding it is running when this callback is called. This
 	 * callback must enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the
 	 * chain if there is one.
 	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
+	 * that bridge is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.enable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called after the CRTC is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
+	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
+	 * - drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
+	 *
 	 * The @atomic_enable callback is optional.
 	 */
 	void (*atomic_enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
@@ -330,16 +413,32 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @atomic_disable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right before
-	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the
-	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
-	 * bridge's @atomic_disable or @disable vfunc. If the preceding element
-	 * is a &drm_encoder it's called right before the
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable hook.
+	 * The @atomic_disable callback should disable the bridge.
 	 *
 	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
 	 * signals) feeding it is still running when this callback is called.
 	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
+	 * that bridge is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called before the encoder is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
+	 *
+	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms.
+	 *
 	 * The @atomic_disable callback is optional.
 	 */
 	void (*atomic_disable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
@@ -348,16 +447,34 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
 	/**
 	 * @atomic_post_disable:
 	 *
-	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right after the
-	 * preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the preceding
-	 * element is a bridge this means it's called after that bridge's
-	 * @atomic_post_disable or @post_disable function. If the preceding
-	 * element is a &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
-	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable hook.
-	 *
 	 * The bridge must assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
-	 * signals) feeding it is no longer running when this callback is
-	 * called.
+	 * signals) feeding this bridge is no longer running when the
+	 * @atomic_post_disable is called.
+	 *
+	 * This callback should perform all the actions required by the hardware
+	 * after it has stopped receiving signals from the preceding element.
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
+	 * that bridge is post-disabled (unless marked otherwise by the
+	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.post_disable
+	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_post_disable
+	 *
+	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
+	 * this callback is called after the encoder is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
+	 *
+	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
+	 *
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
+	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms
 	 *
 	 * The @atomic_post_disable callback is optional.
 	 */
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v13 4/4] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable Aradhya Bhatia
@ 2025-06-05 17:15 ` Aradhya Bhatia
  2025-06-05 18:11 ` [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Thakkar, Devarsh
  2025-06-06 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Aradhya Bhatia @ 2025-06-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Aradhya Bhatia, Alexander Sverdlin

From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>

The cdns-dsi controller requires that it be turned on completely before
the input DPI's source has begun streaming[0]. Not having that, allows
for a small window before cdns-dsi enable and after cdns-dsi disable
where the previous entity (in this case tidss's videoport) to continue
streaming DPI video signals. This small window where cdns-dsi is
disabled but is still receiving signals causes the input FIFO of
cdns-dsi to get corrupted. This causes the colors to shift on the output
display. The colors can either shift by one color component (R->G, G->B,
B->R), or by two color components (R->B, G->R, B->G).

Since tidss's videoport starts streaming via crtc enable hooks, we need
cdns-dsi to be up and running before that. Now that the bridges are
pre_enabled before crtc is enabled, and post_disabled after crtc is
disabled, use the pre_enable and post_disable hooks to get cdns-dsi
ready and running before the tidss videoport to get pass the color shift
issues.

[0]: See section 12.6.5.7.3 "Start-up Procedure" in J721E SoC TRM
     TRM Link: http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruil1

Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
---
 .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c    | 64 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
index 7604574da666..a57ca8c3bdae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
@@ -670,13 +670,28 @@ cdns_dsi_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	return MODE_OK;
 }
 
-static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
-					   struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+						struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct cdns_dsi_input *input = bridge_to_cdns_dsi_input(bridge);
 	struct cdns_dsi *dsi = input_to_dsi(input);
 	u32 val;
 
+	/*
+	 * The cdns-dsi controller needs to be disabled after it's DPI source
+	 * has stopped streaming. If this is not followed, there is a brief
+	 * window before DPI source is disabled and after cdns-dsi controller
+	 * has been disabled where the DPI stream is still on, but the cdns-dsi
+	 * controller is not ready anymore to accept the incoming signals. This
+	 * is one of the reasons why a shift in pixel colors is observed on
+	 * displays that have cdns-dsi as one of the bridges.
+	 *
+	 * To mitigate this, disable this bridge from the bridge post_disable()
+	 * hook, instead of the bridge _disable() hook. The bridge post_disable()
+	 * hook gets called after the CRTC disable, where often many DPI sources
+	 * disable their streams.
+	 */
+
 	val = readl(dsi->regs + MCTL_MAIN_DATA_CTL);
 	val &= ~(IF_VID_SELECT_MASK | IF_VID_MODE | VID_EN | HOST_EOT_GEN |
 		 DISP_EOT_GEN);
@@ -688,15 +703,6 @@ static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	if (dsi->platform_ops && dsi->platform_ops->disable)
 		dsi->platform_ops->disable(dsi);
 
-	pm_runtime_put(dsi->base.dev);
-}
-
-static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
-						struct drm_atomic_state *state)
-{
-	struct cdns_dsi_input *input = bridge_to_cdns_dsi_input(bridge);
-	struct cdns_dsi *dsi = input_to_dsi(input);
-
 	dsi->phy_initialized = false;
 	dsi->link_initialized = false;
 	phy_power_off(dsi->dphy);
@@ -774,8 +780,8 @@ static void cdns_dsi_init_link(struct cdns_dsi *dsi)
 	dsi->link_initialized = true;
 }
 
-static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
-					  struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct cdns_dsi_input *input = bridge_to_cdns_dsi_input(bridge);
 	struct cdns_dsi *dsi = input_to_dsi(input);
@@ -792,6 +798,21 @@ static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	u32 tmp, reg_wakeup, div, status;
 	int nlanes;
 
+	/*
+	 * The cdns-dsi controller needs to be enabled before it's DPI source
+	 * has begun streaming. If this is not followed, there is a brief window
+	 * after DPI source enable and before cdns-dsi controller enable where
+	 * the DPI stream is on, but the cdns-dsi controller is not ready to
+	 * accept the incoming signals. This is one of the reasons why a shift
+	 * in pixel colors is observed on displays that have cdns-dsi as one of
+	 * the bridges.
+	 *
+	 * To mitigate this, enable this bridge from the bridge pre_enable()
+	 * hook, instead of the bridge _enable() hook. The bridge pre_enable()
+	 * hook gets called before the CRTC enable, where often many DPI sources
+	 * enable their streams.
+	 */
+
 	if (WARN_ON(pm_runtime_get_sync(dsi->base.dev) < 0))
 		return;
 
@@ -811,8 +832,8 @@ static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
 	nlanes = output->dev->lanes;
 
-	cdns_dsi_hs_init(dsi);
 	cdns_dsi_init_link(dsi);
+	cdns_dsi_hs_init(dsi);
 
 	/*
 	 * Now that the DSI Link and DSI Phy are initialized,
@@ -941,19 +962,6 @@ static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	writel(tmp, dsi->regs + MCTL_MAIN_EN);
 }
 
-static void cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
-					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
-{
-	struct cdns_dsi_input *input = bridge_to_cdns_dsi_input(bridge);
-	struct cdns_dsi *dsi = input_to_dsi(input);
-
-	if (WARN_ON(pm_runtime_get_sync(dsi->base.dev) < 0))
-		return;
-
-	cdns_dsi_init_link(dsi);
-	cdns_dsi_hs_init(dsi);
-}
-
 static u32 *cdns_dsi_bridge_get_input_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 					       struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
 					       struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
@@ -1048,9 +1056,7 @@ cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_reset(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 static const struct drm_bridge_funcs cdns_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
 	.attach = cdns_dsi_bridge_attach,
 	.mode_valid = cdns_dsi_bridge_mode_valid,
-	.atomic_disable = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable,
 	.atomic_pre_enable = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
-	.atomic_enable = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable,
 	.atomic_post_disable = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
 	.atomic_check = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_check,
 	.atomic_reset = cdns_dsi_bridge_atomic_reset,
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
@ 2025-06-05 18:11 ` Thakkar, Devarsh
  2025-06-06 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Thakkar, Devarsh @ 2025-06-05 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aradhya Bhatia, Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin

Hello Aradhya,

Thanks for the patch series.

On 6/5/2025 10:45 PM, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> This series re-orders the sequences in which the drm CRTC and the drm
> Bridge get enabled and disabled with respect to each other.
> 
> The bridge pre_enable calls have been shifted before the crtc_enable and
> the bridge post_disable calls have been shifted after the crtc_disable.
> 
> This has been done as per the definition of bridge pre_enable.
> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge will
> not yet be running when this callback is called".
> 
> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled.
> 
> The original sequence. for display pipe enable looks like:
> 
>       crtc_enable
> 
>       bridge[n]_pre_enable
>       ...
>       bridge[1]_pre_enable
> 
>       encoder_enable
> 
>       bridge[1]_enable
>       ...
>       bridge[n]_enable
> 
> The sequence of enable after this patch-set will look like:
> 
>       bridge[n]_pre_enable
>       ...
>       bridge[1]_pre_enable
> 
>       crtc_enable
>       encoder_enable
> 
>       bridge[1]_enable
>       ...
>       bridge[n]_enable
> 
> 
> For the disable sequence, this is what the original looks like:
> 
>       bridge[n]_disable
>       ...
>       bridge[1]_disable
> 
>       encoder_disable
> 
>       bridge[1]_post_disable
>       ...
>       bridge[n]_post_disable
> 
>       crtc_disable
> 	        
> This is what the disable sequence will be, after this series of patches:
> 
>       bridge[n]_disable
>       ...
>       bridge[1]_disable
> 
>       encoder_disable
>       crtc_disable
> 
>       bridge[1]_post_disable
>       ...
>       bridge[n]_post_disable
> 
> This series further updates the bridge API definitions to accurately
> reflect the updated scenario.
> 
> This series is a subset of its v11[0] which had 14 patches in the revision.
> 9 of those 14 patches (which were specific to the cdns-dsi bridge driver)
> were merged[1].
> 
> Regards
> Aradhya
> 
> ---
> 
> References:
> [0]: Revision v11 of this series.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250329113925.68204-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> 
> [1]: Patches 1 through 9 getting merged.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/174335361171.2556605.12634785416741695829.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com/
> 
> 
> ---
> Change Log:
> 
>   - Changes in v13:
>     - Style  changes in patch 2/4. (Thomas)
>     - Squash patch v12:4/5 into v12:3/5, which is now v13:3/4. (Thomas)
>     - Add R-b tags from Thomas Zimmermann in patches 1-3.
>     - Rebase onto latest drm-misc-next.
> 
>   - Changes in v12:
>     - Drop patches 1 through 9 since they have been merged.
>     - Rebase onto newer drm-misc-next.
>     - Re-word the patch 3/4, ("drm/bridge: Update the bridge enable/disable doc")
>       to make it more readable.
> 
>   - Changes in v11:
>     - Add patch v11:13/14 ("drm/bridge: Update the bridge enable/disable doc"),
>       that updates the documentation about the order of the various bridge
>       enable/disable hooks being called wrt the CRTC and encoder hooks.
>     - Rebase on drm-misc-next instead of linux-next.
>       As part of rebase, accommodate the following change:
>       - Change patch v10:08/13 ("drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Support atomic bridge
>         APIs") to v11:08/13 ("drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Add input format
>         negotiation"), since Maxime has already updated the bridge hooks to
>         their atomic versions in commit 68c98e227a96 ("drm/bridge: cdns-csi:
>         Switch to atomic helpers").
>         My new patch now only adds the format negotiation hook for the cdns-dsi.
>         (Note: Since the new patch is now only a subset of the old one, without
>         any change in logic, I decided to carry forward the R-b and T-b tags.)
>     - Add Alexander Sverdlin's T-b in patches 10, 11, 12.
> 
>   - Changes in v10:
>     - Rebase on latest linux-next (next-20250226).
>     - As part of rebase, update the patches to accommodate a couple of
>       widespread changes in DRM Framework -
>         - All the ("drm/atomic-helper: Change parameter name of ***") commits.
>         - All the ("drm/bridge: Pass full state to ***") commits.
>       (These updates are only trivial substitutions.)
>     - Add Tomi Valkeinen's T-b tags in all the patches.
> 
>   - Changes in v9:
>     - Fix the oops in 11/13 - where the encoder_bridge_enable _was_ pre_enabling
>       the bridges instead of enabling.
>     - Add the following tags:
>       - Dmitry Baryshkov's R-b in patches 2, 10, 11, and A-b in patch 12.
>       - Jayesh Choudhary's R-b in patch 12.
>       - Tomi Valkeinen's R-b in patches 2, 10, 11, 12.
> 
>   - Changes in v8:
>     - Move the phy de-initialization to bridge post_disable() instead of bridge
>       disable() in patch-3.
>     - Copy the private bridge state (dsi_cfg), in addition to the bridge_state,
>       in patch-9.
>     - Split patch v7:11/12 into three patches, v8:{10,11,12}/13, to separate out
>       different refactorings into different patches, and improve bisectability.
>     - Move patch v7:02/12 down to v8:06/12, to keep the initial patches for
>       fixes only.
>     - Drop patch v7:04/12 as it doesn't become relevant until patch v7:12/12.
>     - Add R-b tags of Dmitry Baryshkov in patch-9 and patch-3, and of
>       Tomi Valkeinen in patch-9.
>    
>   - Changes in v7:
>     - phy_init()/exit() were called from the PM path in v6. Change it back to
>       the bridge enable/disable path in patch-3, so that the phy_init() can go
>       back to being called after D-Phy reset assert.
>     - Reword commit text in patch-5 to explain the need of the fix.
>     - Drop the stray code in patch-10.
>     - Add R-b tag of Dmitry Baryshkov in patch-6.
> 
>   - Changes in v6:
>     - Reword patch 3 to better explain the fixes around phy de-init.
>     - Fix the Lane ready timeout condition in patch 7.
>     - Fix the dsi _bridge_atomic_check() implementation by adding a new
>       bridge state structure in patch 10.
>     - Rework and combine patches v5:11/13 and v5:12/13 to v6:11/12.
>     - Generate the patches of these series using the "patience" algorithm.
>       Note: All patches, except v6:11/12, *do not* differ from their default
>       (greedy) algorithm variants.
>       For patch 11, the patience algorithm significantly improves the readability.
>     - Rename and move the Bridge enable/disable enums from public to private
>       in patch 11.
>     - Add R-b tags of Tomi Valkeinen in patch 6, and Dmitry Baryshkov in patch 2.
> 
>   - Changes in v5:
>     - Fix subject and description in patch 1/13.
>     - Add patch to check the return value of
>       phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config() (patch: 6/13).
>     - Change the Clk and Data Lane ready timeout from forever to 5s.
>     - Print an error instead of calling WARN_ON_ONCE in patch 7/13.
>     - Drop patch v4-07/11: "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Reset the DCS write FIFO".
>       There has been some inconsistencies found with this patch upon further
>       testing. This patch was being used to enable a DSI panel based on ILITEK
>       ILI9881C bridge. This will be debugged separately.
>     - Add patch to move the DSI mode check from _atomic_enable() to
>       _atomic_check() (patch: 10/13).
>     - Split patch v4-10/11 into 2 patches - 11/13 and 12/13.
>       Patch 11/13 separates out the Encoder-Bridge operations into a helper
>       function *without* changing the logic. Patch 12/13 then changes the order
>       of the encoder-bridge operations as was intended in the original patch.
>     - Add detailed comment for patch 13/13.
>     - Add Tomi Valkeinen's R-b in patches 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13.
> 
>   - Changes in v4:
>     - Add new patch, "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Move to devm_drm_of_get_bridge()",
>       to update to an auto-managed way of finding next bridge in the chain.
>     - Drop patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix the phy_initialized variable" and
>       add "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix Phy _init() and _exit()" that properly
>       de-initializes the Phy and maintains the initialization state.
>     - Reword patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Reset the DCS write FIFO" to explain
>       the HW concerns better.
>     - Add R-b tag from Dmitry Baryshkov for patches 1/11 and 8/11.
> 
>   - Changes in v3:
>     - Reword the commit message for patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix OF node
>       pointer".
>     - Add a new helper API to figure out DSI host input pixel format
>       in patch "drm/mipi-dsi: Add helper to find input format".
>     - Use a common function for bridge pre-enable and enable, and bridge disable
>       and post-disable, to avoid code duplication.
>     - Add T-b tag from Dominik Haller in patch 5/10. (Missed to add it in v2).
>     - Add R-b tag from Dmitry Baryshkov for patch 8/10.
> 
>   - Changes in v2:
>     - Drop patch "drm/tidss: Add CRTC mode_fixup"
>     - Split patch "drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Fix minor bugs" into 4 separate ones
>     - Drop support for early_enable/late_disable APIs and instead re-order the
>       pre_enable / post_disable APIs to be called before / after crtc_enable /
>       crtc_disable.
>     - Drop support for early_enable/late_disable in cdns-dsi and use
>       pre_enable/post_disable APIs instead to do bridge enable/disable.
> 
> 
> Previous versions:
> 
> v1:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240511153051.1355825-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
> v2:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530093621.1925863-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
> v3:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617105311.1587489-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
> v4:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240622110929.3115714-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/
> v5:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241019195411.266860-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v6:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250111192738.308889-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v7:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250114055626.18816-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v8:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250126191551.741957-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v9:  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250209121032.32655-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226155228.564289-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v11: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250329113925.68204-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> v12: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250406131642.171240-1-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev/
> 
> ---
> 
> Aradhya Bhatia (4):
>   drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into
>     separate functions
>   drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from
>     enable/disable
>   drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
>   drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable
> 

For the series,
Tested-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>

Regards
Devarsh

>  .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c    |  64 +++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c           | 160 +++++++++--
>  include/drm/drm_bridge.h                      | 249 +++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 0b3d99425891e3c4a87259afb88fbd1168dc7707


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops
  2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-05 18:11 ` [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Thakkar, Devarsh
@ 2025-06-06 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2025-06-06 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
	Aradhya Bhatia
  Cc: Maxime Ripard, DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List,
	Nishanth Menon, Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar,
	Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin

On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 22:45:20 +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> This series re-orders the sequences in which the drm CRTC and the drm
> Bridge get enabled and disabled with respect to each other.
> 
> The bridge pre_enable calls have been shifted before the crtc_enable and
> the bridge post_disable calls have been shifted after the crtc_disable.
> 
> This has been done as per the definition of bridge pre_enable.
> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge will
> not yet be running when this callback is called".
> 
> [...]

Applied to misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
       [not found]   ` <CGME20250611104512eucas1p22450fccf3bb7521760bd2d9a2a56ba19@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
@ 2025-06-11 10:45     ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-12  5:49       ` Tomi Valkeinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-06-11 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aradhya Bhatia, Tomi Valkeinen, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Alexander Sverdlin

Hi,

On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>
> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>
> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>
> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
> 	...
> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>
> 	crtc_enable
> 	encoder_enable
>
> 	bridge[1]_enable
> 	...
> 	bridge[n]_enable
>
> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>
> 	bridge[n]_disable
> 	...
> 	bridge[1]_disable
>
> 	encoder_disable
> 	crtc_disable
>
> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
> 	...
> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>
> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>
> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>
> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>

This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9 
("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and 
post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung 
Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of 
them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP 
panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm 
on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based 
Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and 
lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock, 
because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm 
able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger 
seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet, 
as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it 
further and let You know.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c |   8 +-
>   include/drm/drm_bridge.h            | 249 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   2 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index 539b7f072c72..2fe6c91910a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -1336,9 +1336,9 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>   {
>   	encoder_bridge_disable(dev, state);
>   
> -	encoder_bridge_post_disable(dev, state);
> -
>   	crtc_disable(dev, state);
> +
> +	encoder_bridge_post_disable(dev, state);
>   }
>   
>   /**
> @@ -1674,10 +1674,10 @@ encoder_bridge_enable(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>   void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
>   					      struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>   {
> -	crtc_enable(dev, state);
> -
>   	encoder_bridge_pre_enable(dev, state);
>   
> +	crtc_enable(dev, state);
> +
>   	encoder_bridge_enable(dev, state);
>   
>   	drm_atomic_helper_commit_writebacks(dev, state);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> index 0af5db244db8..ecdeb90e5586 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> @@ -165,17 +165,33 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @disable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right before
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
> -	 * bridge's @disable vfunc. If the preceding element is a &drm_encoder
> -	 * it's called right before the &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable,
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare or &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
> -	 * hook.
> +	 * The @disable callback should disable the bridge.
>   	 *
>   	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
>   	 * signals) feeding it is still running when this callback is called.
>   	 *
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
> +	 * that bridge is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called before the encoder is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
> +	 *
> +	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms.
> +	 *
>   	 * The @disable callback is optional.
>   	 *
>   	 * NOTE:
> @@ -188,17 +204,34 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @post_disable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right after the
> -	 * preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the preceding
> -	 * element is a bridge this means it's called after that bridge's
> -	 * @post_disable function. If the preceding element is a &drm_encoder
> -	 * it's called right after the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
> -	 * or &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
> -	 *
>   	 * The bridge must assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
> -	 * signals) feeding it is no longer running when this callback is
> -	 * called.
> +	 * signals) feeding this bridge is no longer running when the
> +	 * @post_disable is called.
> +	 *
> +	 * This callback should perform all the actions required by the hardware
> +	 * after it has stopped receiving signals from the preceding element.
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
> +	 * that bridge is post-disabled (unless marked otherwise by the
> +	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.post_disable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_post_disable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called after the encoder is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
> +	 *
> +	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms
>   	 *
>   	 * The @post_disable callback is optional.
>   	 *
> @@ -241,18 +274,30 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @pre_enable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right before
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
> -	 * bridge's @pre_enable function. If the preceding element is a
> -	 * &drm_encoder it's called right before the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit or
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
> -	 *
>   	 * The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
> -	 * will not yet be running when this callback is called. The bridge must
> -	 * not enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the chain (if
> -	 * there is one) when this callback is called.
> +	 * will not yet be running when the @pre_enable is called.
> +	 *
> +	 * This callback should perform all the necessary actions to prepare the
> +	 * bridge to accept signals from the preceding element.
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
> +	 * that bridge is pre-enabled (unless marked otherwise by
> +	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.pre_enable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_pre_enable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called before the CRTC is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
> +	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
>   	 *
>   	 * The @pre_enable callback is optional.
>   	 *
> @@ -266,19 +311,31 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @enable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right after
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called after that
> -	 * bridge's @enable function. If the preceding element is a
> -	 * &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable, &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit or
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms hook.
> +	 * The @enable callback should enable the bridge.
>   	 *
>   	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
>   	 * signals) feeding it is running when this callback is called. This
>   	 * callback must enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the
>   	 * chain if there is one.
>   	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
> +	 * that bridge is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.enable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called after the CRTC is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
> +	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
> +	 * - drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
>   	 * The @enable callback is optional.
>   	 *
>   	 * NOTE:
> @@ -291,17 +348,30 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @atomic_pre_enable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right before
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
> -	 * bridge's @atomic_pre_enable or @pre_enable function. If the preceding
> -	 * element is a &drm_encoder it's called right before the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable hook.
> -	 *
>   	 * The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
> -	 * will not yet be running when this callback is called. The bridge must
> -	 * not enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the chain (if
> -	 * there is one) when this callback is called.
> +	 * will not yet be running when the @atomic_pre_enable is called.
> +	 *
> +	 * This callback should perform all the necessary actions to prepare the
> +	 * bridge to accept signals from the preceding element.
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
> +	 * that bridge is pre-enabled (unless marked otherwise by
> +	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.pre_enable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_pre_enable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called before the CRTC is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
> +	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
>   	 *
>   	 * The @atomic_pre_enable callback is optional.
>   	 */
> @@ -311,18 +381,31 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @atomic_enable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should enable the bridge. It is called right after
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is enabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called after that
> -	 * bridge's @atomic_enable or @enable function. If the preceding element
> -	 * is a &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable hook.
> +	 * The @atomic_enable callback should enable the bridge.
>   	 *
>   	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
>   	 * signals) feeding it is running when this callback is called. This
>   	 * callback must enable the display link feeding the next bridge in the
>   	 * chain if there is one.
>   	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
> +	 * that bridge is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.enable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called after the CRTC is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
> +	 * and the encoder is enabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.enable
> +	 * - drm_encoder_helper_funcs.commit
> +	 *
>   	 * The @atomic_enable callback is optional.
>   	 */
>   	void (*atomic_enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> @@ -330,16 +413,32 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @atomic_disable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right before
> -	 * the preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the
> -	 * preceding element is a bridge this means it's called before that
> -	 * bridge's @atomic_disable or @disable vfunc. If the preceding element
> -	 * is a &drm_encoder it's called right before the
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable hook.
> +	 * The @atomic_disable callback should disable the bridge.
>   	 *
>   	 * The bridge can assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
>   	 * signals) feeding it is still running when this callback is called.
>   	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called before
> +	 * that bridge is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called before the encoder is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
> +	 *
> +	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms.
> +	 *
>   	 * The @atomic_disable callback is optional.
>   	 */
>   	void (*atomic_disable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> @@ -348,16 +447,34 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>   	/**
>   	 * @atomic_post_disable:
>   	 *
> -	 * This callback should disable the bridge. It is called right after the
> -	 * preceding element in the display pipe is disabled. If the preceding
> -	 * element is a bridge this means it's called after that bridge's
> -	 * @atomic_post_disable or @post_disable function. If the preceding
> -	 * element is a &drm_encoder it's called right after the encoder's
> -	 * &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable hook.
> -	 *
>   	 * The bridge must assume that the display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing
> -	 * signals) feeding it is no longer running when this callback is
> -	 * called.
> +	 * signals) feeding this bridge is no longer running when the
> +	 * @atomic_post_disable is called.
> +	 *
> +	 * This callback should perform all the actions required by the hardware
> +	 * after it has stopped receiving signals from the preceding element.
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element is a &drm_bridge, then this is called after
> +	 * that bridge is post-disabled (unless marked otherwise by the
> +	 * @pre_enable_prev_first flag) via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.post_disable
> +	 * - &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_post_disable
> +	 *
> +	 * If the preceding element of the bridge is a display controller, then
> +	 * this callback is called after the encoder is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.dpms
> +	 *
> +	 * and the CRTC is disabled via one of:
> +	 *
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.prepare
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.atomic_disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.disable
> +	 * - &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.dpms
>   	 *
>   	 * The @atomic_post_disable callback is optional.
>   	 */

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-11 10:45     ` Marek Szyprowski
@ 2025-06-12  5:49       ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-12  6:31         ` Marek Szyprowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2025-06-12  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski, Aradhya Bhatia
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

Hi,

On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>
>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>
>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>
>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>> 	...
>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>
>> 	crtc_enable
>> 	encoder_enable
>>
>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>> 	...
>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>
>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>
>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>> 	...
>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>
>> 	encoder_disable
>> 	crtc_disable
>>
>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>> 	...
>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>
>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>
>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>
>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>
>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
> 
> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9 
> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and 
> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung 
> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of 
> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP 
> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm 
> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based 
> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and 
> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock, 
> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm 
> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger 
> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet, 
> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it 
> further and let You know.

Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
panel.

Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?

 Tomi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-12  5:49       ` Tomi Valkeinen
@ 2025-06-12  6:31         ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-16 15:40           ` Tomi Valkeinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-06-12  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Aradhya Bhatia
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>>
>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>>
>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>>> 	...
>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>>
>>> 	crtc_enable
>>> 	encoder_enable
>>>
>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>>> 	...
>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>>
>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>>
>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>>> 	...
>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>>
>>> 	encoder_disable
>>> 	crtc_disable
>>>
>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>>> 	...
>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>>
>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>>
>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>>
>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
>> further and let You know.
> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
> panel.
>
> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?

Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2 
times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All 
three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try 
to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting 
some more hints where the issue is.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-12  6:31         ` Marek Szyprowski
@ 2025-06-16 15:40           ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-18  6:30             ` Marek Szyprowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2025-06-16 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski, Aradhya Bhatia
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

Hi,

On 12/06/2025 09:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>>>
>>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>>>
>>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>>>> 	...
>>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>>>
>>>> 	crtc_enable
>>>> 	encoder_enable
>>>>
>>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>>>> 	...
>>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>>>
>>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>>>
>>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>>>> 	...
>>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>>>
>>>> 	encoder_disable
>>>> 	crtc_disable
>>>>
>>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>>>> 	...
>>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>>>
>>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>>>
>>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>>>
>>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
>>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
>>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
>>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
>>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
>>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
>>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
>>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
>>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
>>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
>>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
>>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
>>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
>>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
>>> further and let You know.
>> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
>> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
>> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
>> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
>> panel.
>>
>> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?
> 
> Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2 
> times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All 
> three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try 
> to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting 
> some more hints where the issue is.

Did you get a chance to test this more? Any hints what happens will help =)

 Tomi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-16 15:40           ` Tomi Valkeinen
@ 2025-06-18  6:30             ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-18  8:27               ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-06-18  6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Aradhya Bhatia
  Cc: DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon,
	Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary,
	Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

On 16.06.2025 17:40, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/06/2025 09:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>>>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>>>>> 	...
>>>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>>>>
>>>>> 	crtc_enable
>>>>> 	encoder_enable
>>>>>
>>>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>>>>> 	...
>>>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>>>>
>>>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>>>>> 	...
>>>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>>>>
>>>>> 	encoder_disable
>>>>> 	crtc_disable
>>>>>
>>>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>>>>> 	...
>>>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>>>>
>>>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>>>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>>>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>>>>
>>>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>>>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>>>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>>>>
>>>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
>>>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
>>>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
>>>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
>>>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
>>>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
>>>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
>>>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
>>>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
>>>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
>>>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
>>>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
>>>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
>>>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
>>>> further and let You know.
>>> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
>>> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
>>> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
>>> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
>>> panel.
>>>
>>> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?
>> Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2
>> times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All
>> three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try
>> to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting
>> some more hints where the issue is.
> Did you get a chance to test this more? Any hints what happens will help =)

I've spent some time debugging this issue, but so far I only got 
something I don't really understand. This issue is somehow related with 
the DP clock enabling and disabling, what is being done from 
exynos_dp_poweron() and exynos_dp_poweroff() functions, which are called 
from analogix_dp_resume() and analogix_dp_suspend(). The lockup happens 
somewhere while registering the fbdev console, with console lock held, 
what makes debugging much harder.

I've did some experiments with pm runtime of the analogix_dp_core driver 
and increased autosuspend delay to 200 msec. This magically fixed the 
issue, but I still see no direct calls to analogix_dp without proper pm 
runtime guards.


Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-18  6:30             ` Marek Szyprowski
@ 2025-06-18  8:27               ` Maxime Ripard
  2025-06-18 10:01                 ` Marek Szyprowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2025-06-18  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski
  Cc: Tomi Valkeinen, Aradhya Bhatia, DRI Development List,
	Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon, Vignesh Raghavendra,
	Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin,
	Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss,
	Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4628 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 16.06.2025 17:40, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 12/06/2025 09:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> >>>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
> >>>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
> >>>>> 	...
> >>>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	crtc_enable
> >>>>> 	encoder_enable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
> >>>>> 	...
> >>>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
> >>>>> 	...
> >>>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	encoder_disable
> >>>>> 	crtc_disable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
> >>>>> 	...
> >>>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
> >>>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
> >>>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
> >>>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
> >>>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> >>>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> >>>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
> >>>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
> >>>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
> >>>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
> >>>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
> >>>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
> >>>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
> >>>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
> >>>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
> >>>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
> >>>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
> >>>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
> >>>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
> >>>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
> >>>> further and let You know.
> >>> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
> >>> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
> >>> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
> >>> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
> >>> panel.
> >>>
> >>> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?
> >> Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2
> >> times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All
> >> three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try
> >> to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting
> >> some more hints where the issue is.
> > Did you get a chance to test this more? Any hints what happens will help =)
> 
> I've spent some time debugging this issue, but so far I only got 
> something I don't really understand. This issue is somehow related with 
> the DP clock enabling and disabling, what is being done from 
> exynos_dp_poweron() and exynos_dp_poweroff() functions, which are called 
> from analogix_dp_resume() and analogix_dp_suspend(). The lockup happens 
> somewhere while registering the fbdev console, with console lock held, 
> what makes debugging much harder.

You can skip the locking part with the fb.lockless_register_fb=1 kernel
parameter. It's of course not meant for anything but debugging, but it's
useful :)

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-18  8:27               ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2025-06-18 10:01                 ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-18 10:05                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-18 16:27                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-06-18 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxime Ripard
  Cc: Tomi Valkeinen, Aradhya Bhatia, DRI Development List,
	Linux Kernel List, Nishanth Menon, Vignesh Raghavendra,
	Devarsh Thakkar, Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin,
	Dmitry Baryshkov, Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss,
	Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	Maarten Lankhorst, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

On 18.06.2025 10:27, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 16.06.2025 17:40, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 12/06/2025 09:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>>>> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>>>>>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	crtc_enable
>>>>>>> 	encoder_enable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	encoder_disable
>>>>>>> 	crtc_disable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>>>>>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>>>>>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>>>>>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>>>>>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>>>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
>>>>>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
>>>>>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
>>>>>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
>>>>>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
>>>>>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
>>>>>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
>>>>>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
>>>>>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
>>>>>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
>>>>>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
>>>>>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
>>>>>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
>>>>>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
>>>>>> further and let You know.
>>>>> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
>>>>> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
>>>>> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
>>>>> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
>>>>> panel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?
>>>> Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2
>>>> times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All
>>>> three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try
>>>> to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting
>>>> some more hints where the issue is.
>>> Did you get a chance to test this more? Any hints what happens will help =)
>> I've spent some time debugging this issue, but so far I only got
>> something I don't really understand. This issue is somehow related with
>> the DP clock enabling and disabling, what is being done from
>> exynos_dp_poweron() and exynos_dp_poweroff() functions, which are called
>> from analogix_dp_resume() and analogix_dp_suspend(). The lockup happens
>> somewhere while registering the fbdev console, with console lock held,
>> what makes debugging much harder.
> You can skip the locking part with the fb.lockless_register_fb=1 kernel
> parameter. It's of course not meant for anything but debugging, but it's
> useful :)

I've finally found where is the problem! It turned out that the issue is 
in the exynos_drm_fimd driver, in the code for enabling the display port 
clock (fimd_dp_clock_enable()
  function). It touches FIMD regs, but it was not guarded with FIMD's 
runtime pm calls and after the $subject change it happened that 
exynos_dp/analogix_dp code called the clock enable/disable when FIMD 
driver (which implements the CRTC object) was not runtime resumed. 
Previously all dp clock handling was done when CRTC was enabled, thus 
the FIMD device was in the resumed runtime pm state.

I will send a patch fixing this soon.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-18 10:01                 ` Marek Szyprowski
@ 2025-06-18 10:05                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-18 16:27                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2025-06-18 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski, Maxime Ripard
  Cc: Aradhya Bhatia, DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List,
	Nishanth Menon, Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar,
	Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov,
	Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart,
	Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

Hi,

On 18/06/2025 13:01, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 18.06.2025 10:27, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 16.06.2025 17:40, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>>> On 12/06/2025 09:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>> On 12.06.2025 07:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/06/2025 13:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05.06.2025 19:15, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Move the bridge pre_enable call before crtc enable, and the bridge
>>>>>>>> post_disable call after the crtc disable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The sequence of enable after this patch will look like:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_pre_enable
>>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_pre_enable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	crtc_enable
>>>>>>>> 	encoder_enable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_enable
>>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_enable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, the disable sequence for the display pipeline will look like:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_disable
>>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_disable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	encoder_disable
>>>>>>>> 	crtc_disable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[1]_post_disable
>>>>>>>> 	...
>>>>>>>> 	bridge[n]_post_disable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The definition of bridge pre_enable hook says that,
>>>>>>>> "The display pipe (i.e. clocks and timing signals) feeding this bridge
>>>>>>>> will not yet be running when this callback is called".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since CRTC is also a source feeding the bridge, it should not be enabled
>>>>>>>> before the bridges in the pipeline are pre_enabled. Fix that by
>>>>>>>> re-ordering the sequence of bridge pre_enable and bridge post_disable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While at it, update the drm bridge API documentation as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
>>>>>>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c9b1150a68d9
>>>>>>> ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and
>>>>>>> post-disable"). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of Samsung
>>>>>>> Exynos 5420/5800 based Chromebooks (Peach-Pit and Peach-Pi). Both of
>>>>>>> them use Exynos DRM with Exynos_DP sub-driver (Analogix DP) and EDP
>>>>>>> panel. Booting stops at '[drm] Initialized exynos 1.1.0 for exynos-drm
>>>>>>> on minor 0' message. On the other hand, the Samsung Exynos5250 based
>>>>>>> Snow Chromebook boots fine, but it uses dp-lvds nxp,ptn3460 bridge and
>>>>>>> lvds panel instead of edp panels. This looks like some sort of deadlock,
>>>>>>> because if I disable FBDEV emulation, those boards boots fine and I'm
>>>>>>> able to run modetest and enable the display. Also the DRM kernel logger
>>>>>>> seems to be working fine, although I didn't check the screen output yet,
>>>>>>> as I only have a remote access to those boards. I will investigate it
>>>>>>> further and let You know.
>>>>>> Thanks for the report. I was trying to understand the pipeline, but I'm
>>>>>> a bit confused. Above you say Peach-Pit uses DP and EDP panel, but if I
>>>>>> look at arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts, it connects
>>>>>> a dp->lvds bridge (parade,ps8625). Peach-Pi seems to connect to an eDP
>>>>>> panel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the above correct? Do both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fail?
>>>>> Yes, sorry, my fault. I much have checked the same (peach-pi) dts 2
>>>>> times. Both Peach-Pi and Peach-Pit fails, while Snow works fine. All
>>>>> three use the same Exynos DP (based on analogix dp) driver. I will try
>>>>> to play a bit more with those boards in the afternoon, hopefully getting
>>>>> some more hints where the issue is.
>>>> Did you get a chance to test this more? Any hints what happens will help =)
>>> I've spent some time debugging this issue, but so far I only got
>>> something I don't really understand. This issue is somehow related with
>>> the DP clock enabling and disabling, what is being done from
>>> exynos_dp_poweron() and exynos_dp_poweroff() functions, which are called
>>> from analogix_dp_resume() and analogix_dp_suspend(). The lockup happens
>>> somewhere while registering the fbdev console, with console lock held,
>>> what makes debugging much harder.
>> You can skip the locking part with the fb.lockless_register_fb=1 kernel
>> parameter. It's of course not meant for anything but debugging, but it's
>> useful :)
> 
> I've finally found where is the problem! It turned out that the issue is 
> in the exynos_drm_fimd driver, in the code for enabling the display port 
> clock (fimd_dp_clock_enable()
>   function). It touches FIMD regs, but it was not guarded with FIMD's 
> runtime pm calls and after the $subject change it happened that 
> exynos_dp/analogix_dp code called the clock enable/disable when FIMD 
> driver (which implements the CRTC object) was not runtime resumed. 
> Previously all dp clock handling was done when CRTC was enabled, thus 
> the FIMD device was in the resumed runtime pm state.
> 
> I will send a patch fixing this soon.

Alright, sounds like we don't need to revert the re-ordering patch after
all =). Thanks for debugging this.

 Tomi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable
  2025-06-18 10:01                 ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-18 10:05                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
@ 2025-06-18 16:27                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2025-06-18 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski, Maxime Ripard
  Cc: Aradhya Bhatia, DRI Development List, Linux Kernel List,
	Nishanth Menon, Vignesh Raghavendra, Devarsh Thakkar,
	Jayesh Choudhary, Alexander Sverdlin, Dmitry Baryshkov,
	Andrzej Hajda, Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart,
	Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter

On 18/06/2025 13:01, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> I've finally found where is the problem! It turned out that the issue is 
> in the exynos_drm_fimd driver, in the code for enabling the display port 
> clock (fimd_dp_clock_enable()
>   function). It touches FIMD regs, but it was not guarded with FIMD's 
> runtime pm calls and after the $subject change it happened that 
> exynos_dp/analogix_dp code called the clock enable/disable when FIMD 
> driver (which implements the CRTC object) was not runtime resumed. 
> Previously all dp clock handling was done when CRTC was enabled, thus 
> the FIMD device was in the resumed runtime pm state.

We have another issue the this patch: i.MX8MM (and MP) seem to have a
problem with DSI, which is using the samsung-dsim.c driver. For me, the
first time I run kmstest I get a black screen. The second time I get a
display, but it's horizontally in the wrong place.

Perhaps you have an idea about this if you're familiar with the
samsung-dsim?.

The issue seems to be that earlier the order was:

mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()

now the order is:

samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()

If I move the samsung_dsim_init() call from
samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable() to samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(), it
starts to work.

My guess is that the DSI init requires a pixel stream from the crtc, and
now that the (pre)init is done without the pixel stream, it goes wrong.
But this is purely a guess so far.

I also see that the samsung_dsim_init() call is behind
"!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos()", so you probably don't hit this issue...

 Tomi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-18 16:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-05 17:15 [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Aradhya Bhatia
2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] drm/atomic-helper: Refactor crtc & encoder-bridge op loops into separate functions Aradhya Bhatia
2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] drm/atomic-helper: Separate out bridge pre_enable/post_disable from enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable Aradhya Bhatia
     [not found]   ` <CGME20250611104512eucas1p22450fccf3bb7521760bd2d9a2a56ba19@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-11 10:45     ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-12  5:49       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-06-12  6:31         ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-16 15:40           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-06-18  6:30             ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-18  8:27               ` Maxime Ripard
2025-06-18 10:01                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-18 10:05                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-06-18 16:27                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Use pre_enable/post_disable to enable/disable Aradhya Bhatia
2025-06-05 18:11 ` [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/atomic-helper: Re-order CRTC and Bridge ops Thakkar, Devarsh
2025-06-06 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).