From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:46:41 -0800 Message-ID: <04f677b1-bc44-f004-cf2a-51b47baf0965@gmail.com> References: <20181023235750.103146-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brendan Higgins , shuah@kernel.org Cc: Greg KH , Kees Cook , mcgrof@kernel.org, Joel Stanley , mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, khilman@baylibre.com, Julia Lawall , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring , dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 11/6/18 5:17 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Shuah Khan wrote: >> >> Hi Brendan, > >> Framework looks good. I think it would be helpful to include a real test > > Great to hear! > >> in the patch series to get a feel for how effective it is. > > Alright, will do. Rob suggested converting > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19/source/drivers/of/unittest.c to > KUnit, so that might offer a good comparison. drivers/of/unittest.c might be a bit bigger and more complex test than you want to start with. -Frank < snip >