From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Skeggs Subject: Re: [patch -next] nouveua: sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE() Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:12:33 +1000 Message-ID: <1292893956.2214.14.camel@nisroch> References: <20101220092626.GT1936@bicker> Reply-To: bskeggs@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C429F398 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:13:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101220092626.GT1936@bicker> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 12:26 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > ARRAY_SIZE() was intended here, sizeof() is too large. Thanks, I've queued this patch. Ben. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c > index 47489ed..58e98ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_vram.c > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ nv50_vram_flags_valid(struct drm_device *dev, u32 tile_flags) > { > int type = (tile_flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_TILE_LAYOUT_MASK) >> 8; > > - if (likely(type < sizeof(types) && types[type])) > + if (likely(type < ARRAY_SIZE(types) && types[type])) > return true; > return false; > }