From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: commit notifications in bugzilla Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:48:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1309430924_45071@CP5-2952> References: <20110630123805.07c163bc@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (server109-228-6-236.live-servers.net [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90200A098F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:48:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110630123805.07c163bc@schatten.dmk.lab> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Florian Mickler , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:38:05 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > Hi, > I have just posted notifications to the bugs.fdo bugzilla for commits > out of v2.6.39..v3.0-rc5 that mention a bug via full link at > bugs.fdo . > > See for example https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38529 . > > Is this considered signal or noise? I find it useful. My policy has been not to close bugs until the patch has been applied to an upstream tree. So confirmation that it did arrive, and its identifier in Linus' tree, is indeed valuable. Thanks, -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre