dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: j.glisse@gmail.com
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Subject: [PATCH 15/24] drm/radeon: remove recursive mutex implementation
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:03:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335380609-5804-16-git-send-email-j.glisse@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335380609-5804-1-git-send-email-j.glisse@gmail.com>

From: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>

Not needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h        |   44 +-------------------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c     |   10 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c |    2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c   |   16 ++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c    |    4 +-
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index c7f14d7..6ec4025 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -155,48 +155,6 @@ static inline int radeon_atrm_get_bios_chunk(uint8_t *bios, int offset, int len)
 #endif
 bool radeon_get_bios(struct radeon_device *rdev);
 
-
-/*
- * Mutex which allows recursive locking from the same process.
- */
-struct radeon_mutex {
-	struct mutex		mutex;
-	struct task_struct	*owner;
-	int			level;
-};
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_init(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
-	mutex_init(&mutex->mutex);
-	mutex->owner = NULL;
-	mutex->level = 0;
-}
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_lock(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
-	if (mutex_trylock(&mutex->mutex)) {
-		/* The mutex was unlocked before, so it's ours now */
-		mutex->owner = current;
-	} else if (mutex->owner != current) {
-		/* Another process locked the mutex, take it */
-		mutex_lock(&mutex->mutex);
-		mutex->owner = current;
-	}
-	/* Otherwise the mutex was already locked by this process */
-
-	mutex->level++;
-}
-
-static inline void radeon_mutex_unlock(struct radeon_mutex *mutex)
-{
-	if (--mutex->level > 0)
-		return;
-
-	mutex->owner = NULL;
-	mutex_unlock(&mutex->mutex);
-}
-
-
 /*
  * Dummy page
  */
@@ -1497,7 +1455,7 @@ struct radeon_device {
 	struct radeon_gem		gem;
 	struct radeon_pm		pm;
 	uint32_t			bios_scratch[RADEON_BIOS_NUM_SCRATCH];
-	struct radeon_mutex		cs_mutex;
+	struct mutex			cs_mutex;
 	struct radeon_wb		wb;
 	struct radeon_dummy_page	dummy_page;
 	bool				shutdown;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index a0826bb..38e1496 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
@@ -505,9 +505,9 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
 	struct radeon_cs_parser parser;
 	int r;
 
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	if (!rdev->accel_working) {
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 	/* initialize parser */
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
 		DRM_ERROR("Failed to initialize parser !\n");
 		radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
 		r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		return r;
 	}
 	r = radeon_cs_parser_relocs(&parser);
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
 			DRM_ERROR("Failed to parse relocation %d!\n", r);
 		radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
 		r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		return r;
 	}
 	r = radeon_cs_ib_chunk(rdev, &parser);
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ int radeon_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
 out:
 	radeon_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r);
 	r = radeon_cs_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	return r;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index 1dac27d..5df53dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ int radeon_device_init(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 
 	/* mutex initialization are all done here so we
 	 * can recall function without having locking issues */
-	radeon_mutex_init(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
 		mutex_init(&rdev->ring[i].mutex);
 	mutex_init(&rdev->dc_hw_i2c_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
index 220dbb8..b4a4982 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
@@ -356,13 +356,13 @@ int radeon_vm_manager_suspend(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 {
 	struct radeon_vm *vm, *tmp;
 
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	/* unbind all active vm */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vm, tmp, &rdev->vm_manager.lru_vm, list) {
 		radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
 	}
 	rdev->vm_manager.funcs->fini(rdev);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	return radeon_sa_bo_manager_suspend(rdev, &rdev->vm_manager.sa_manager);
 }
 
@@ -480,9 +480,9 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_add(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	if (last_pfn > vm->last_pfn) {
 		/* grow va space 32M by 32M */
 		unsigned align = ((32 << 20) >> 12) - 1;
-		radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		vm->last_pfn = (last_pfn + align) & ~align;
 	}
 	head = &vm->va;
@@ -598,9 +598,9 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_rmv(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 		return 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	radeon_vm_bo_update_pte(rdev, vm, bo, NULL);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	list_del(&bo_va->vm_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
 	list_del(&bo_va->bo_list);
@@ -645,9 +645,9 @@ void radeon_vm_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm)
 
 	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
 
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 
 	/* remove all bo */
 	r = radeon_bo_reserve(rdev->sa_manager.bo, false);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
index e15cb1f..bd4521e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
@@ -157,11 +157,11 @@ void radeon_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
 static int radeon_gem_handle_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, int r)
 {
 	if (r == -EDEADLK) {
-		radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev);
 		if (!r)
 			r = -EAGAIN;
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	}
 	return r;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-25 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-25 19:03 Reworking of GPU reset logic + dumping j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 01/24] drm/radeon: remove fence/ring/ib debugfs files j.glisse
2012-04-26  9:11   ` Christian König
2012-04-26  9:18     ` David Airlie
2012-04-26 13:36       ` Jerome Glisse
2012-04-26 13:58         ` Alex Deucher
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 02/24] drm/radeon: make radeon_gpu_is_lockup a per ring function j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 03/24] drm/radeon: replace gpu_lockup with ring->ready flag j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 04/24] drm/radeon: use central function for IB testing j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 05/24] drm/radeon: rework gpu lockup detection and processing j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 06/24] drm/radeon: fix a critical bug in the SA code j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 07/24] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v2 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 08/24] drm/radeon: add biggest hole tracking and wakequeue to the sa v4 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 09/24] drm/radeon: simplify semaphore handling j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 10/24] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 11/24] drm/radeon: rename fence_wait_last to fence_wait_empty j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 12/24] drm/radeon: rip out the ib pool v2 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 13/24] drm/radeon: fix a bug with the ring syncing code j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 14/24] drm/radeon: rework recursive gpu reset handling j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` j.glisse [this message]
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 16/24] drm/radeon: move lockup detection code into radeon_ring.c v2 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 17/24] drm/radeon: make lockup timeout a module param j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 18/24] drm/radeon: unlock the ring mutex while waiting for the next fence j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 19/24] drm/radeon: make forcing ring activity a common function j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 20/24] drm/radeon: remove r300_gpu_is_lockup j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 21/24] drm/radeon: remove cayman_gpu_is_lockup j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 22/24] drm/radeon: extend ring debugfs files with fence info c2 j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 23/24] drm/radeon: keep the cs relocs inside the ib j.glisse
2012-04-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 24/24] drm/radeon: add faulty command buffer dump facilities j.glisse
2012-04-25 21:53   ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-04-25 22:30     ` Jerome Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335380609-5804-16-git-send-email-j.glisse@gmail.com \
    --to=j.glisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox