dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
To: airlied@redhat.com
Cc: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 15/26] drm/radeon: add general purpose fence signaled callback
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:50:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335797464-14317-16-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335797464-14317-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de>

Should be used to free resource that are protected by a fence.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h       |    8 ++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index ce22b01..74b6595 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ struct radeon_fence_driver {
 	wait_queue_head_t		queue;
 	struct list_head		created;
 	struct list_head		emitted;
-	struct list_head		signaled;
 	bool				initialized;
 };
 
@@ -274,6 +273,10 @@ struct radeon_fence {
 	/* RB, DMA, etc. */
 	int				ring;
 	struct radeon_semaphore		*semaphore;
+
+	/* called when fence is signaled */
+	void	(*signal_callback)(struct radeon_device *rdev, void *data);
+	void	*callback_data;
 };
 
 int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
@@ -289,6 +292,9 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_empty(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
 struct radeon_fence *radeon_fence_ref(struct radeon_fence *fence);
 void radeon_fence_unref(struct radeon_fence **fence);
 int radeon_fence_count_emitted(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
+bool radeon_fence_set_signal_callback(struct radeon_fence *fence,
+                                      void (*callback)(struct radeon_device *, void *),
+                                      void *data);
 
 /*
  * Tiling registers
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index 2d13843..c58660a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ int radeon_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence *fence)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool radeon_fence_poll_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
+static bool radeon_fence_poll_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring,
+				     struct list_head *signaled)
 {
 	struct radeon_fence *fence;
 	struct list_head *i, *n;
@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static bool radeon_fence_poll_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 		i = n;
 		do {
 			n = i->prev;
-			list_move_tail(i, &rdev->fence_drv[ring].signaled);
+			list_move_tail(i, signaled);
 			fence = list_entry(i, struct radeon_fence, list);
 			fence->signaled = true;
 			i = n;
@@ -120,6 +121,20 @@ static bool radeon_fence_poll_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 	return wake;
 }
 
+static void radeon_fence_process_signaled(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct list_head *signaled)
+{
+	struct radeon_fence *fence;
+	struct list_head *i, *n;
+
+	list_for_each_safe(i, n, signaled) {
+		fence = list_entry(i, struct radeon_fence, list);
+		list_del_init(&fence->list);
+		if (fence->signal_callback) {
+			fence->signal_callback(rdev, fence->callback_data);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static void radeon_fence_destroy(struct kref *kref)
 {
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -152,6 +167,8 @@ int radeon_fence_create(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	(*fence)->seq = 0;
 	(*fence)->ring = ring;
 	(*fence)->semaphore = NULL;
+	(*fence)->signal_callback = NULL;
+	(*fence)->callback_data = NULL;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(*fence)->list);
 
 	write_lock_irqsave(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
@@ -164,6 +181,7 @@ bool radeon_fence_signaled(struct radeon_fence *fence)
 {
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
 	bool signaled = false;
+	LIST_HEAD(siglist);
 
 	if (!fence)
 		return true;
@@ -179,10 +197,12 @@ bool radeon_fence_signaled(struct radeon_fence *fence)
 		signaled = true;
 	}
 	if (!signaled) {
-		radeon_fence_poll_locked(fence->rdev, fence->ring);
+		radeon_fence_poll_locked(fence->rdev, fence->ring, &siglist);
 		signaled = fence->signaled;
 	}
 	write_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
+	radeon_fence_process_signaled(fence->rdev, &siglist);
+
 	return signaled;
 }
 
@@ -341,10 +361,12 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 {
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
 	bool wake;
+	LIST_HEAD(signaled);
 
 	write_lock_irqsave(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
-	wake = radeon_fence_poll_locked(rdev, ring);
+	wake = radeon_fence_poll_locked(rdev, ring, &signaled);
 	write_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
+	radeon_fence_process_signaled(rdev, &signaled);
 	if (wake) {
 		wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].queue);
 	}
@@ -373,6 +395,25 @@ int radeon_fence_count_emitted(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 	return not_processed;
 }
 
+bool radeon_fence_set_signal_callback(struct radeon_fence *fence,
+				      void (*callback)(struct radeon_device *, void *),
+				      void *data)
+{
+	struct radeon_device *rdev = fence->rdev;
+	unsigned long irq_flags;
+	bool isset = false;
+
+	/* a readlock is suficient, cause this should be called only once */
+	read_lock_irqsave(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
+	if (fence->emitted && !fence->signaled) {
+		fence->signal_callback = callback;
+		fence->callback_data = data;
+		isset = true;
+	}
+	read_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
+	return isset;
+}
+
 int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 {
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -413,7 +454,6 @@ static void radeon_fence_driver_init_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 	atomic_set(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].seq, 0);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].created);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].emitted);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].signaled);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].queue);
 	rdev->fence_drv[ring].initialized = false;
 }
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-30 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 14:50 Include request for reset-rework branch Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/26] drm/radeon: make radeon_gpu_is_lockup a per ring function Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/26] drm/radeon: replace gpu_lockup with ring->ready flag Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/26] drm/radeon: register ring debugfs handlers on init Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/26] drm/radeon: use central function for IB testing Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/26] drm/radeon: rework gpu lockup detection and processing Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/26] drm/radeon: fix a bug in the SA code Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/26] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v2 Christian König
2012-04-30 15:58   ` Jerome Glisse
2012-05-01 12:31     ` Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/26] drm/radeon: add sub allocator debugfs file Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/26] drm/radeon: add biggest hole tracking and wakequeue to the sa v3 Christian König
2012-04-30 15:45   ` Jerome Glisse
2012-05-01 12:22     ` Christian König
2012-05-01 15:24       ` Jerome Glisse
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/26] drm/radeon: add try_free callback to the SA Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/26] drm/radeon: use inline functions to calc sa_bo addr Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/26] drm/radeon: simplify semaphore handling Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 13/26] drm/radeon: return -ENOENT in fence_wait_next v2 Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 14/26] drm/radeon: rename fence_wait_last to fence_wait_empty Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` Christian König [this message]
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 16/26] drm/radeon: don't keep list of created fences Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 17/26] drm/radeon: rip out the ib pool v2 Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 18/26] drm/radeon: fix a bug with the ring syncing code Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 19/26] drm/radeon: rework recursive gpu reset handling Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 20/26] drm/radeon: remove recursive mutex implementation Christian König
2012-04-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 21/26] drm/radeon: move lockup detection code into radeon_ring.c Christian König
2012-04-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 22/26] drm/radeon: make lockup timeout a module param Christian König
2012-04-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 23/26] drm/radeon: unlock the ring mutex while waiting for the next fence Christian König
2012-04-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 24/26] drm/radeon: make forcing ring activity a common function Christian König
2012-04-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 25/26] drm/radeon: remove r300_gpu_is_lockup Christian König
2012-04-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 26/26] drm/radeon: remove cayman_gpu_is_lockup Christian König
2012-04-30 15:12 ` Include request for reset-rework branch Jerome Glisse
2012-04-30 15:12   ` Jerome Glisse
2012-04-30 15:37     ` Christian König
2012-04-30 16:26       ` Jerome Glisse
2012-05-01 13:38         ` Christian König
2012-05-01 13:37 ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335797464-14317-16-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de \
    --to=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox