From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] drm: Document how to register devices without struct drm_bus
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 12:21:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400754084-25707-4-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400754084-25707-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
With the recent addition of the drm_set_unique() function, devices can
now be registered without requiring a drm_bus. Add a brief description
to the DRM docbook to show how that can be achieved.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- replace drm_dev_put() recommendation by explicit drm_dev_unregister()
followed by drm_dev_unref()
- use !E in DocBook to insert kernel-doc for all exported symbols
Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl
index 438edcd566b5..09f8788fec3f 100644
--- a/Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl
+++ b/Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@
to register it with the DRM subsystem.
</para>
<para>
+ Newer drivers that no longer require a <structname>drm_bus</structname>
+ structure can alternatively use the low-level device initialization and
+ registration functions such as <function>drm_dev_alloc()</function> and
+ <function>drm_dev_register()</function> directly.
+ </para>
+ <para>
The <structname>drm_driver</structname> structure contains static
information that describes the driver and features it supports, and
pointers to methods that the DRM core will call to implement the DRM API.
@@ -290,6 +296,26 @@ char *date;</synopsis>
!Edrivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
!Edrivers/gpu/drm/drm_usb.c
!Edrivers/gpu/drm/drm_platform.c
+ <para>
+ New drivers that no longer rely on the services provided by the
+ <structname>drm_bus</structname> structure can call the low-level
+ device registration functions directly. The
+ <function>drm_dev_alloc()</function> function can be used to allocate
+ and initialize a new <structname>drm_device</structname> structure.
+ Drivers will typically want to perform some additional setup on this
+ structure, such as allocating driver-specific data and storing a
+ pointer to it in the DRM device's <structfield>dev_private</structfield>
+ field. Drivers should also set the device's unique name using the
+ <function>drm_dev_set_unique()</function> function. After it has been
+ set up a device can be registered with the DRM subsystem by calling
+ <function>drm_dev_register()</function>. This will cause the device to
+ be exposed to userspace and will call the driver's
+ <structfield>.load()</structfield> implementation. When a device is
+ removed, the DRM device can safely be unregistered and freed by calling
+ <function>drm_dev_unregister()</function> followed by a call to
+ <function>drm_dev_unref()</function>.
+ </para>
+!Edrivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Driver Load</title>
--
1.9.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 10:21 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/tegra: Remove host1x drm_bus implementation Thierry Reding
2014-05-22 10:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce drm_dev_set_unique() Thierry Reding
2014-05-22 11:06 ` David Herrmann
2014-05-22 10:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm: Add device registration documentation Thierry Reding
2014-05-22 22:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-22 10:21 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-05-22 22:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm: Document how to register devices without struct drm_bus Daniel Vetter
2014-05-22 10:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/tegra: Remove host1x drm_bus implementation Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400754084-25707-4-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox