From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active" Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:53:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1404291203.12021.18.camel@x220> References: <1404140703.2978.13.camel@x41> <87egy5h1yz.fsf@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87egy5h1yz.fsf@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Jani Nikula Cc: Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A > bisect result would be awesome. Too bad. Unless someone else has a better idea I hope to start bisecting one of these days (that might take quite some time, especially since I can't yet narrow the bisect to changes in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/, can I?). Don't expect results before v3.16-rc4. Feel free to remind me if I stay silent on this subject for too long. Paul Bolle