From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC] drm: store property instead of id in obj attachment
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:19:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417047563-20262-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
Keep property pointer, instead of id, in per mode-object attachments.
This will simplify things in later patches.
---
Does anyone care about the lifetime issue and dangling property ptrs?
Currently properties are destroyed during drm_mode_config_cleanup(),
so it doesn't really matter.. if someone *did* see a use for dynamically
destroying properties we'd have to do something a bit more clever and
handle properly detaching from any mode object to which that property
had been attached.
Just sending as an RFC for now, but later atomic properties/ioctl patches
will depend on this.
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 17 ++++++++---------
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index 3ba84df..3e6ef39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
@@ -2058,12 +2058,11 @@ int drm_mode_getconnector(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
prop_ptr = (uint32_t __user *)(unsigned long)(out_resp->props_ptr);
prop_values = (uint64_t __user *)(unsigned long)(out_resp->prop_values_ptr);
for (i = 0; i < connector->properties.count; i++) {
- if (put_user(connector->properties.ids[i],
- prop_ptr + copied)) {
+ struct drm_property *prop = connector->properties.properties[i];
+ if (put_user(prop->base.id, prop_ptr + copied)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
-
if (put_user(connector->properties.values[i],
prop_values + copied)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
@@ -3744,7 +3743,7 @@ void drm_object_attach_property(struct drm_mode_object *obj,
return;
}
- obj->properties->ids[count] = property->base.id;
+ obj->properties->properties[count] = property;
obj->properties->values[count] = init_val;
obj->properties->count++;
}
@@ -3769,7 +3768,7 @@ int drm_object_property_set_value(struct drm_mode_object *obj,
int i;
for (i = 0; i < obj->properties->count; i++) {
- if (obj->properties->ids[i] == property->base.id) {
+ if (obj->properties->properties[i] == property) {
obj->properties->values[i] = val;
return 0;
}
@@ -3799,7 +3798,7 @@ int drm_object_property_get_value(struct drm_mode_object *obj,
int i;
for (i = 0; i < obj->properties->count; i++) {
- if (obj->properties->ids[i] == property->base.id) {
+ if (obj->properties->properties[i] == property) {
*val = obj->properties->values[i];
return 0;
}
@@ -4263,8 +4262,8 @@ int drm_mode_obj_get_properties_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
prop_values_ptr = (uint64_t __user *)(unsigned long)
(arg->prop_values_ptr);
for (i = 0; i < props_count; i++) {
- if (put_user(obj->properties->ids[i],
- props_ptr + copied)) {
+ struct drm_property *prop = obj->properties->properties[i];
+ if (put_user(prop->base.id, props_ptr + copied)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
@@ -4322,7 +4321,7 @@ int drm_mode_obj_set_property_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out;
for (i = 0; i < arg_obj->properties->count; i++)
- if (arg_obj->properties->ids[i] == arg->prop_id)
+ if (arg_obj->properties->properties[i]->base.id == arg->prop_id)
break;
if (i == arg_obj->properties->count)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
index dd2c16e..017029d 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
@@ -64,7 +64,12 @@ struct drm_mode_object {
#define DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY 24
struct drm_object_properties {
int count;
- uint32_t ids[DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY];
+ /* NOTE: if we ever start dynamically destroying properties (ie.
+ * not at drm_mode_config_cleanup() time), then we'd have to do
+ * a better job of detaching property from mode objects to avoid
+ * dangling property pointers:
+ */
+ struct drm_property *properties[DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY];
uint64_t values[DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY];
};
--
1.9.3
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 0:19 Rob Clark [this message]
2014-12-02 18:47 ` [RFC] drm: store property instead of id in obj attachment Sean Paul
2014-12-02 19:09 ` Rob Clark
2014-12-03 13:55 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417047563-20262-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox