dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drm/radeon: split evergreen_cs_check_reg
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:57:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440291458-11602-3-git-send-email-notasas@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440291458-11602-1-git-send-email-notasas@gmail.com>

evergreen_cs_check_reg() is a large function and gcc doesn't want to
inline it. It has a quick check for reg_safe_bm[] to see if register
needs special handling, which often results in early exit. However
because the function is large, it has a long prologue/epilogue to
save/restore all the callee-save registers which according to perf is
taking significant amount of time. To avoid this, we can reuse
evergreen_is_safe_reg() to do the early check directly in register loop.

Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c
index 5c840da..4453799 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c
@@ -1086,30 +1086,18 @@ static int evergreen_cs_parse_packet0(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
 }
 
 /**
- * evergreen_cs_check_reg() - check if register is authorized or not
+ * evergreen_cs_handle_reg() - process registers that need special handling.
  * @parser: parser structure holding parsing context
  * @reg: register we are testing
  * @idx: index into the cs buffer
- *
- * This function will test against evergreen_reg_safe_bm and return 0
- * if register is safe. If register is not flag as safe this function
- * will test it against a list of register needind special handling.
  */
-static int evergreen_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
+static int evergreen_cs_handle_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
 {
 	struct evergreen_cs_track *track = (struct evergreen_cs_track *)p->track;
 	struct radeon_bo_list *reloc;
-	u32 m, i, tmp, *ib;
+	u32 tmp, *ib;
 	int r;
 
-	i = (reg >> 7);
-	if (unlikely(i >= REG_SAFE_BM_SIZE)) {
-		dev_warn(p->dev, "forbidden register 0x%08x at %d\n", reg, idx);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-	m = 1 << ((reg >> 2) & 31);
-	if (!(track->reg_safe_bm[i] & m))
-		return 0;
 	ib = p->ib.ptr;
 	switch (reg) {
 	/* force following reg to 0 in an attempt to disable out buffer
@@ -1756,20 +1744,27 @@ static int evergreen_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool evergreen_is_safe_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
+/**
+ * evergreen_is_safe_reg() - check if register is authorized or not
+ * @parser: parser structure holding parsing context
+ * @reg: register we are testing
+ *
+ * This function will test against reg_safe_bm and return true
+ * if register is safe or false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool evergreen_is_safe_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg)
 {
 	struct evergreen_cs_track *track = p->track;
 	u32 m, i;
 
 	i = (reg >> 7);
 	if (unlikely(i >= REG_SAFE_BM_SIZE)) {
-		dev_warn(p->dev, "forbidden register 0x%08x at %d\n", reg, idx);
 		return false;
 	}
 	m = 1 << ((reg >> 2) & 31);
 	if (!(track->reg_safe_bm[i] & m))
 		return true;
-	dev_warn(p->dev, "forbidden register 0x%08x at %d\n", reg, idx);
+
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -2306,7 +2301,9 @@ static int evergreen_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < pkt->count; i++) {
 			reg = start_reg + (4 * i);
-			r = evergreen_cs_check_reg(p, reg, idx+1+i);
+			if (evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg))
+				continue;
+			r = evergreen_cs_handle_reg(p, reg, idx + 1 + i);
 			if (r)
 				return r;
 		}
@@ -2322,7 +2319,9 @@ static int evergreen_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < pkt->count; i++) {
 			reg = start_reg + (4 * i);
-			r = evergreen_cs_check_reg(p, reg, idx+1+i);
+			if (evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg))
+				continue;
+			r = evergreen_cs_handle_reg(p, reg, idx + 1 + i);
 			if (r)
 				return r;
 		}
@@ -2577,8 +2576,11 @@ static int evergreen_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
 		} else {
 			/* SRC is a reg. */
 			reg = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+1) << 2;
-			if (!evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg, idx+1))
+			if (!evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg)) {
+				dev_warn(p->dev, "forbidden register 0x%08x at %d\n",
+					 reg, idx + 1);
 				return -EINVAL;
+			}
 		}
 		if (idx_value & 0x2) {
 			u64 offset;
@@ -2601,8 +2603,11 @@ static int evergreen_packet3_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
 		} else {
 			/* DST is a reg. */
 			reg = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx+3) << 2;
-			if (!evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg, idx+3))
+			if (!evergreen_is_safe_reg(p, reg)) {
+				dev_warn(p->dev, "forbidden register 0x%08x at %d\n",
+					 reg, idx + 3);
 				return -EINVAL;
+			}
 		}
 		break;
 	case PACKET3_NOP:
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-23  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-23  0:57 [PATCH 0/4] some optimization for evergreen cs Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-08-23  0:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/radeon: simplify register checker Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-08-23  0:57 ` Grazvydas Ignotas [this message]
2015-08-23  0:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/radeon: refactor register check loop Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-08-23  0:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/radeon: remove volatile qualifier Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-09-22 23:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] some optimization for evergreen cs Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-09-23  6:59   ` Dave Airlie
2015-09-23 21:54     ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1440291458-11602-3-git-send-email-notasas@gmail.com \
    --to=notasas@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox