dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, michel.daenzer@amd.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Slightly more robust flip completion handling for < DCE-4
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:25:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474115139-25201-2-git-send-email-mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474115139-25201-1-git-send-email-mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>

Pre DCE4 hardware doesn't have (reliable) pageflip completion
irqs, therefore we have to use the old polling method for flip
completion handling in vblank irq.

As vblank irqs fire a bit before start of vblank (when the
linebuffer fifo read position reaches end of scanout), we
have some fudge for flip completion handling in the last
lines of active scanout. Old code assumed the threshold to
be 99% of active scanout height, a ballpark estimate which
worked ok. Since we know since a while how to calculate the
actual threshold from linebuffer size, lets make use of it
to get a more accurate threshold.

This completion path is still prone to some races in corner
cases, especially on pre-AVIVO hardware, so document them
a bit better in the code comments.

Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index 890171f..5070646 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -321,16 +321,30 @@ void radeon_crtc_handle_vblank(struct radeon_device *rdev, int crtc_id)
 	update_pending = radeon_page_flip_pending(rdev, crtc_id);
 
 	/* Has the pageflip already completed in crtc, or is it certain
-	 * to complete in this vblank?
+	 * to complete in this vblank? GET_DISTANCE_TO_VBLANKSTART provides
+	 * distance to start of "fudged earlier" vblank in vpos, distance to
+	 * start of real vblank in hpos. vpos >= 0 && hpos < 0 means we are in
+	 * the last few scanlines before start of real vblank, where the vblank
+	 * irq can fire, so we have sampled update_pending a bit too early and
+	 * know the flip will complete at leading edge of the upcoming real
+	 * vblank. On pre-AVIVO hardware, flips also complete inside the real
+	 * vblank, not only at leading edge, so if update_pending for hpos >= 0
+	 *  == inside real vblank, the flip will complete almost immediately.
+	 * Note that this method of completion handling is still not 100% race
+	 * free, as we could execute before the radeon_flip_work_func managed
+	 * to run and set the RADEON_FLIP_SUBMITTED status, thereby we no-op,
+	 * but the flip still gets programmed into hw and completed during
+	 * vblank, leading to a delayed emission of the flip completion event.
+	 * This applies at least to pre-AVIVO hardware, where flips are always
+	 * completing inside vblank, not only at leading edge of vblank.
 	 */
 	if (update_pending &&
-	    (DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID & radeon_get_crtc_scanoutpos(rdev->ddev,
-							       crtc_id,
-							       USE_REAL_VBLANKSTART,
-							       &vpos, &hpos, NULL, NULL,
-							       &rdev->mode_info.crtcs[crtc_id]->base.hwmode)) &&
-	    ((vpos >= (99 * rdev->mode_info.crtcs[crtc_id]->base.hwmode.crtc_vdisplay)/100) ||
-	     (vpos < 0 && !ASIC_IS_AVIVO(rdev)))) {
+	    (DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID &
+	     radeon_get_crtc_scanoutpos(rdev->ddev, crtc_id,
+					GET_DISTANCE_TO_VBLANKSTART,
+					&vpos, &hpos, NULL, NULL,
+					&rdev->mode_info.crtcs[crtc_id]->base.hwmode)) &&
+	    ((vpos >= 0 && hpos < 0) || (hpos >= 0 && !ASIC_IS_AVIVO(rdev)))) {
 		/* crtc didn't flip in this target vblank interval,
 		 * but flip is pending in crtc. Based on the current
 		 * scanout position we know that the current frame is
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-17 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-17 12:25 Patches to go on top of Michels page_flip_target patches Mario Kleiner
2016-09-17 12:25 ` Mario Kleiner [this message]
2016-09-20  2:58   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Slightly more robust flip completion handling for < DCE-4 Michel Dänzer
2016-09-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon: Prevent races on pre DCE4 between flip submission and completion Mario Kleiner
2016-09-20  2:56   ` Michel Dänzer
2016-09-29 13:36     ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1474115139-25201-2-git-send-email-mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
    --to=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michel.daenzer@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).