From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:24:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1474575862.12009.8.camel@redhat.com> References: <20160922100257.GN13620@mwanda> <45c2ad6e-fadc-8d4a-f6bd-ddf8604ec622@users.sourceforge.net> <1474559218.12009.2.camel@redhat.com> <2ef305ff-38f7-5dad-1307-169fcb3f78a9@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2ef305ff-38f7-5dad-1307-169fcb3f78a9@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Dan Carpenter , Bhaktipriya Shridhar , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Julia Lawall , Daniel Vetter , Tejun Heo , Thierry Reding List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Do, 2016-09-22 at 19:16 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > For starters make sure the patches land actually on the list. > > How do you think about to take another look at this update suggestion > also by the usual archive interfaces? > > * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9344521/ > > * https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ I fail to see the point in this change. On init failure qdev will be released anyway, and whenever the fields are initialized or not when kfree() is called doesn't matter at all. > > Only the cover letter arrived here. > > Would you like to clarify any more technical difficulties around > the desired message exchange? Hmm, not sure what happened. According to the kernel.org link the patch has been sent to dri-devel (where I'm subscribed), but the patch never landed in by mailbox for some reason. cheers, Gerd