From: "Nicolai Hähnle" <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Nicolai Hähnle" <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@mblankhorst.nl>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Nicolai Hähnle" <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/12] locking/ww_mutex: Remove the __ww_mutex_lock inline wrappers
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:46:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482346000-9927-6-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1482346000-9927-1-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com>
From: Nicolai Hähnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com>
Keep the documentation in the header file since there is no good
place for it in mutex.c: there are two rather different
implementations with different EXPORT_SYMBOLs for each function.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
---
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 18 ++++--------------
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index a5960e5..b2eaaab 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -186,11 +186,6 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
#endif
}
-extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
-extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
-
/**
* ww_mutex_lock - acquire the w/w mutex
* @lock: the mutex to be acquired
@@ -220,10 +215,8 @@ extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-static inline int ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
-{
- return __ww_mutex_lock(lock, ctx);
-}
+extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_interruptible - acquire the w/w mutex, interruptible
@@ -255,11 +248,8 @@ static inline int ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ct
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-static inline int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
-{
- return __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(lock, ctx);
-}
+extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_slow - slowpath acquiring of the w/w mutex
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index a41bec2..282c6de 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
}
int __sched
-__ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
int ret;
@@ -831,10 +831,10 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__ww_mutex_lock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ww_mutex_lock);
int __sched
-__ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
int ret;
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__ww_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ww_mutex_lock_interruptible);
#endif
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
int __sched
-__ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
might_sleep();
@@ -1037,10 +1037,10 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
return __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath(lock, ctx);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ww_mutex_lock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_lock);
int __sched
-__ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
might_sleep();
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
return __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(lock, ctx);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ww_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_lock_interruptible);
#endif
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1482346000-9927-1-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com>
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] drm/vgem: Use ww_mutex_(un)lock even with a NULL context Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] locking/mutex: Fix a race with handoffs and interruptible waits Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] locking/ww_mutex: Extract stamp comparison to __ww_mutex_stamp_after Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-22 1:58 ` zhoucm1
2016-12-22 8:43 ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] locking/ww_mutex: Set use_ww_ctx even when locking without a context Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` Nicolai Hähnle [this message]
2016-12-23 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] locking/ww_mutex: Remove the __ww_mutex_lock inline wrappers Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-23 11:16 ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-23 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] locking/ww_mutex: Add waiters in stamp order Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] locking/ww_mutex: Notify waiters that have to back off while adding tasks to wait list Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] locking/ww_mutex: Wake at most one waiter for back off when acquiring the lock Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] locking/ww_mutex: Re-check ww->ctx in the inner optimistic spin loop Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] locking/ww_mutex: Yield to other waiters from optimistic spin Nicolai Hähnle
2017-01-05 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] locking/mutex: Initialize mutex_waiter::ww_ctx with poison when debugging Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-21 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] Documentation/locking/ww_mutex: Update the design document Nicolai Hähnle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1482346000-9927-6-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com \
--to=nhaehnle@gmail.com \
--cc=Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dev@mblankhorst.nl \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox