From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] drm: Remove users of drm_format_(horz|vert)_chroma_subsampling Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:32:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1555507937.6446.10.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <749889cdf957406c86c1791c5bc2a00c3cb1be53.1555487650.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <749889cdf957406c86c1791c5bc2a00c3cb1be53.1555487650.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst , Sean Paul , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Sakari Ailus , Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Thomas Petazzoni , Paul Kocialkowski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Emil Velikov List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 09:54 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > drm_format_horz_chroma_subsampling and drm_format_vert_chroma_subsampling > are basically a lookup in the drm_format_info table plus an access to the > hsub and vsub fields of the appropriate entry. > > Most drivers are using this function while having access to the entry > already, which means that we will perform an unnecessary lookup. Removing > the call to these functions is therefore more efficient. > > Some drivers will not have access to that entry in the function, but in > this case the overhead is minimal (we just have to call drm_format_info() > to perform the lookup) and we can even avoid multiple, inefficient lookups > in some places that need multiple fields from the drm_format_info > structure. > > This is amplified by the fact that most of the time the callers will have > to retrieve both the vsub and hsub fields, meaning that they would perform > twice the lookup. > > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov > Reviewed-by: Paul Kocialkowski > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel Just one small suggestion: [...] > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > index 20a9c296d027..345d5cb5e956 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > @@ -317,21 +317,18 @@ static void scl_vop_cal_scl_fac(struct vop *vop, const struct vop_win_data *win, > uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h, uint32_t dst_w, > uint32_t dst_h, uint32_t pixel_format) > { > + const struct drm_format_info *info = drm_format_info(pixel_format); The only call site in vop_plane_atomic_update passes fb->format->format as pixel_format parameter, so this could be simplified even further by replacing the uint32_t pixelformat argument with a const struct drm_format_info *info, and passing fb->format directly instead. regards Philipp