From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] drm: Remove users of
drm_format_(horz|vert)_chroma_subsampling
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:32:17 +0200
Message-ID: <1555507937.6446.10.camel@pengutronix.de>
References:
<749889cdf957406c86c1791c5bc2a00c3cb1be53.1555487650.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To: <749889cdf957406c86c1791c5bc2a00c3cb1be53.1555487650.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Maxime Ripard , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst , Sean Paul , Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Sakari Ailus , Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Thomas Petazzoni , Paul Kocialkowski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Emil Velikov
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 09:54 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> drm_format_horz_chroma_subsampling and drm_format_vert_chroma_subsampling
> are basically a lookup in the drm_format_info table plus an access to the
> hsub and vsub fields of the appropriate entry.
>
> Most drivers are using this function while having access to the entry
> already, which means that we will perform an unnecessary lookup. Removing
> the call to these functions is therefore more efficient.
>
> Some drivers will not have access to that entry in the function, but in
> this case the overhead is minimal (we just have to call drm_format_info()
> to perform the lookup) and we can even avoid multiple, inefficient lookups
> in some places that need multiple fields from the drm_format_info
> structure.
>
> This is amplified by the fact that most of the time the callers will have
> to retrieve both the vsub and hsub fields, meaning that they would perform
> twice the lookup.
>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov
> Reviewed-by: Paul Kocialkowski
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel
Just one small suggestion:
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index 20a9c296d027..345d5cb5e956 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -317,21 +317,18 @@ static void scl_vop_cal_scl_fac(struct vop *vop, const struct vop_win_data *win,
> uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h, uint32_t dst_w,
> uint32_t dst_h, uint32_t pixel_format)
> {
> + const struct drm_format_info *info = drm_format_info(pixel_format);
The only call site in vop_plane_atomic_update passes fb->format->format
as pixel_format parameter, so this could be simplified even further by
replacing the uint32_t pixelformat argument with a const struct
drm_format_info *info, and passing fb->format directly instead.
regards
Philipp