From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Simon Ser" <contact@emersion.fr>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vidith Madhu <vmadhu@nvidia.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: Native DisplayID support in core DRM
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 13:44:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c856d01-a13a-46cf-9338-cf8fbdaa35ca@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faf56da55c4a67edc2474134eb335bbd874f684b@intel.com>
Hi
Am 04.05.26 um 12:30 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2026, Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> wrote:
>> The big one here is the "EDID" blob property exposed by KMS. We can't just put
>> a DisplayID blob in there, that would break user-space. We'll need a new
>> property.
> I think the big question is what do we do with the EDID property when we
> encounter a display with native DisplayID.
>
> The VESA E-DDC spec says the host should try DisplayID first, and not
> read the EDID if a DisplayID is found. However, if we only update the
> DisplayID property and not the EDID property, I think that'll be a
> regression.
Is there a technical problem/side effect/interference from reading both?
>
> So maybe we need to read both DisplayID and EDID, contrary to what the
> E-DDC spec says. Obviously that means slower detection overall, for all
> displays, old and new. Especially if there are errors reading DisplayID,
> which you'd expect with old displays.
IMHO we should
1) follow the spec and expose DisplayID first and EDID only if the
former is not available, and
2) provide a kernel config option to provide both.
People building kernel usually have control over user space as well.
That option can be enabled by anyone with a legacy user space. This also
puts some mild pressure on user space to implement DisplayID.
>
> There's an additional catch. The E-DDC spec says the capabilities in the
> DisplayID don't need to be a strict superset of the capabilities in the
> EDID. The idea is that the DisplayID is for new hosts, and the EDID is
> for legacy and max interoperability. But if we read both and aim for no
> regressions, we'll have to expose a union of the capabilities.
>
> Strict adherence to spec isn't exactly what EDID is known for. We're
> likely to encounter displays where the DisplayID and EDID contradict
> each other, and we'll have to mediate between them.
Same here. DisplayID first and treat EDID as legacy.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> And what userspace does with all of this is a mess of its own...
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 19:51 Native DisplayID support in core DRM Vidith Madhu
2026-04-20 20:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-20 20:26 ` Vidith Madhu
2026-04-30 21:11 ` Simon Ser
2026-05-04 10:30 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-04 11:44 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2026-04-23 7:53 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c856d01-a13a-46cf-9338-cf8fbdaa35ca@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=contact@emersion.fr \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vmadhu@nvidia.com \
--cc=wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=xorg-devel@lists.x.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox