[Bug 30007] Regression in r300g

[bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30007

--- Comment #21 from Fredrik Höglund <fredrik@kde.org> 2010-09-12 15:51:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Why would you use relative addressing (= indirect indexing) in the fragment
> shader then? If it's not indexing with a loop counter (my assumption), what is
> it?

The shader used for scaling the thumbnails is indeed indexing with a loop
counter. That shader looks like this:

uniform sampler2D texUnit;
uniform vec2 offsets[25];
uniform vec4 kernel[25];
uniform int kernelSize;

void main(void)
{
    vec4 sum = texture2D(texUnit, gl_TexCoord[0].st) * kernel[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < kernelSize; i++) {
        sum += texture2D(texUnit, gl_TexCoord[0].st - offsets[i]) * kernel[i];
        sum += texture2D(texUnit, gl_TexCoord[0].st + offsets[i]) * kernel[i];
    }
    gl_FragColor = sum;
}

That's why I think it's this shader that failed to compile. But this is not the
shader that's used by the blur effect (which this bug report was about). So I
believe we're looking at two separate issues here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel