From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:50:49 +0200 Message-ID: <201009171550.49282.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> <201009171245.41930.arnd@arndb.de> <20100917133231.GA9411@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100917133231.GA9411@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Jan Kara , codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Friday 17 September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > ncpfs: replace BKL with lock_super > > Err, no. lock_super is just as much on it's way out as the BKL. We've > managed to move it down from the VFS into a few remaining filesystems > and now need to get rid of those users. Please don't add any new ones. Ok. I guess that's also a NAK for my the isofs patch I posted yesterday then. Do you have any suggestions for an alternative approach? Arnd