dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	stable@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add early unregister of firmware fb's
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:46:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101006194646.GB3640@joi.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006185412.GB3555@viiv.ffwll.ch>

On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:54:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:20:15PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:39:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > +static void radeon_kick_out_firmware_fb(struct drm_device *ddev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct apertures_struct *ap;
> > > +	bool primary = false;
> > > +
> > > +	ap = alloc_apertures(1);
> > > +	ap->ranges[0].base = pci_resource_start(ddev->pdev, 0);
> > > +	ap->ranges[0].size = pci_resource_len(ddev->pdev, 0);
> > 
> > Any reason why this range differs from the one in radeonfb_create?
> > Maybe it needs to be fixed there too?
> 
> I've stumbled over that, too. It won't really matter at all because the
> fb subsystem does an intersection check. The values in radeonfb_create
> look more like the correct ones, but I can't get at them before the card
> is initialized.

I think regions passed to fb layer should be "memory I want exclusive access to",
not "memory where I want to have the framebuffer", because the first one is stronger - 
you don't want other framebuffer to mess with your non-fb memory...

Marcin

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-06 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-06 16:39 [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add early unregister of firmware fb's Daniel Vetter
2010-10-06 18:20 ` Marcin Slusarz
2010-10-06 18:54   ` Daniel Vetter
2010-10-06 19:46     ` Marcin Slusarz [this message]
2010-10-31 15:47 ` Daniel Vetter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-10  7:34 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-16  7:00 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-08-16  7:31   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101006194646.GB3640@joi.lan \
    --to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox