From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 20142] enabling underscan by default behaves badly with so many
monitors.
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:05:13 GMT
Message-ID: <201010130005.o9D05D7P004888@demeter2.kernel.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
To: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20142
--- Comment #3 from Luca Niccoli 2010-10-13 00:05:10 ---
I know, but my point is that there are too many displays that use 1080p to
choose underscan by default.
Also, TVs that show the "HD Ready 1080p" logo are required to support a mode
that doesn't overscan ([0], p. 13).
Besides, if I understand it correctly, underscanning is really just a
workaround that produces blurred images.
Underscan support is fine, but I don't think it should be enabled by default
with such a (necessarily) approximative euristic.
[0]
http://www.digitaleurope.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/HD_ready_1080p_1188470475.pdf
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
--